Wow!! This is an interesting thread, and I love hearing some very valid points on the price increase... It was definately noticable this time around... I realize that it is acceptable for prices to go up, due to inflation & demand - but it seems in the past 2 years, they've been going up exponentially...
Honestly when a bag gets over the $500.00, I'm going to spend that $$ on an LV, not a
Coach, even though I love Coach.
100%!! There are some things in the Fall catalog that I REALLY like... one of them is $798. It has already crossed my mind, that sure - I really like this bag... but if I put $200 more with that, that is one Balenciaga bag right there!!
I'm concerned.
What realy made me notice was when Angie posted her clay shoulder bag which really looks like the size of the shoulder zip and is 448!
I went back and looked through the catalog and realized everything was going up and sh*ts still made in china.
Having just taken an International Business class for my MBA, where alot of emphasis was put on China as a trading partner, I have to agree... The harsh realities of how much money a company can save by outsourcing are there, and China has an incredibly huge workforce that will work cheaply. (Factor endowment I believe,... see I learned something in class!!
) Anyhow... when you take into account that these bags are made in China, Coach is making money HAND OVER FIST on them...
Now add that to the fact that I can add a "measley" $200 to the Coach price and get a Balenciaga bag that was made in Italy? I am wondering how many other people will start putting these facts together...
...This is why Coach has a looooooonnnnng way to go before they break into the premier end of designer handbags. If they ever do, which, frankly, would require a wholesale makeover of their popular identity and pricing model. Rubber stamping the same tired yet classic feature all over every bag does not a luxury brand make.
My undergrad degree is in marketing, so I love talking about topics like this, and Cinediva - I think you hit the nail on the head. Once a brand's image has been entrenched into its customer's minds... its hard to replace that image with a new one. Thus, the power of branding...
If Coach truely wanted to target the lower AND higher ends of the luxury market, my professional suggestion would be to start marketing the higher end luxury line under a different brand name!! That way, the "Coach quality" would still be inherited... however they would be building a brand image, rather then trying to change one that has been around for quite some time. (How would you feel if Coca-Cola decided they wanted to start selling orange juice?)
Additionally... this is the same thing we see in automotive lines. The mid-range vehicles and higher end luxury vehicles are sold under two different brand names. A person that buys an Audi is most likely not going to be interested in a VW... however, a person that has owned VWs previously could look to move into the higher end vehicle and would connect the positive imagery from VW with Audi... Thus, they have built a brand image connection by establishing two seperate brands for different target markets...
Hope someone at Coach is reading this. (PS - I'm not working right now either, and available for hire. I'm a grad student, I work cheap as long as I can get a thesis topic out of it....
)