Anybody knows about the LARGE 2.55 reissue size?

Our PurseForum community is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.
Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker. Thank you!
  1. I am going to order the Large 2.55 reissue that Saks caries right now but I'm not sure how big of LARGE size,227 or 228 ? I never saw the real bag but I owned the 226 dark silver that I think it's a little bit too tight for me. S:yes:o I would like to ask if any of you have bought the LARGE METALIC NAVY reissue? I saw some list on Ebay said it's 8"x14"... and the pictures gave me the feeling the it's pretty big. I' m not quite sure that will be too big for me or not.

    So could you tell me how do you think about this reissue's size.

    Thank you very much,
     
  2. This is from the sticky up top discussing the classic flap vs. the 2.55... I would check it out...

    http://forum.purseblog.com/chanel/reference-difference-between-2-55-classic-flaps-other-9853.html

    new Reissues:
    the original 225 A37586 $2425
    the original 226 A37587 $2695
    the original 227 A37590 $2850
    the original 228 A37591 $3495


    A37586 $2425: 9 1/2"w x 6"h x 3"d
    A37587 $2695: 11"w x 6 3/4"h x 3 3/8"d
    A37590 $2850: 12 1/2"w x 7 1/2"h x 3 3/4"d
    A37591 $3495: 13 3/4"w x 8 1/4"h x 4 3/4"d

    In reality, I'm a little tight in the Med flap, I also have the 227 in the reissue and that has plenty of room for my stuff.
     
  3. I have a 228 navy metallic and a 227 red metallic. Because of the new width, I think the 228 feels huge! For once, I prefer the 227!
     
  4. I agree with Regina07, I saw the 228 navy in real life and thought it was huge even though I'm usually an 'over-sized bag' person! I also picked the 227 for myself...
     
  5. Thanks you guys!
    I would have to change my mind then.:sad: