I've been on a purse craze for a while now and I've amassed quite a collection of Chloe bags. I have four Paddingtons - grenat large hobo, black/black with long strap, bleu nuit bowler and a metallic anthracite mini. I *just* got the grenat, too. But - I just came across a metallic mini in aubergine, which is absolutely my favorite metallic. I really want it - but can I justify it? Pros: - It's my favorite Chloe metallic, and though I really like the anthracite, I loooooove the aubergine. - I love its silver hardware! - It's perfect for nights out, since it's small. - It goes perfectly with almost my entire wardrobe since I dress in mostly black, grey, and other dark neutrals. I also wear a lot of burgundy and other dark reds, which I think will play nicely off the aubergine. - My fiance probably won't notice that I added a bag to my collection as I already have anthracite and they are similar Cons: - I don't use the anthracite bag much as it is because it's fairly impractical in NYC - I need my hands free! So I'm not sure how much I would use it. - I already have anthracite, which is really similar. Also, anthracite is more neutral so I could wear it with colors that the aubergine wouldn't go with. - Metallic aubergine is known for having color rubbing problems, and this bag already shows some small signs of the color rubbing off (but the current color rub-off is not noticeable enough to deter me from buying). - Seriously, do I really need another handbag? Obviously I am overthinking this - probably because I'm trying to avoid thinking about the next meeting I have to go to at work - but I would love to hear some opinions.