I was also curious about the sudden controversy over seat recline I found this on another forum (snopes.com) from 2006! So it's not such a "sudden" controversy afterall:
Originally posted by JetBlue Representative: (obvious spelling errors corrected)
Dear Mr. n,
Thank you for contacting us regarding JetBlue's reclining seat space. We appreciate the opportunity to address your question. JetBlue does not have set guidelines on who 'owns' the recline space.
The answer to this question would be the option of the person who is answering it. I did not want to just give you my own thoughts so I asked a number of JetBlue crewmembers for their opinion .
The crewmembers I asked agreed that passenger A has the right to recline the seat to make himself more comfortable; therefore passenger A 'owns' the recline space an here is why: Our in-flight seats are made to recline to make our customers as comfortable as possible. The customer sitting in the seat has control over the seat and may recline it at any time. We hope our customers will respect the needs and comfort of other customers on board.
We think all our customer should always be comfortable -- except maybe when they're doing yoga. That's why we've made all our aircraft "leg-friendly", with up to 34 inches of seat pitch on our Airbus A320s and up to 33" in our new EMBRAER E190s.
Whether you're on the go or taking it slow, we want you to be able to recline your seats and and stretch your legs! We hope our opinion helps, and we look forward to serving you on board a JetBlue flight soon!
Sincerely,
Mandy
Customer Commitment Crew
JetBlue Airways
Crewmember 14931
Original Message Follows:
------------------------
Comments submitted from Speak Up Forms
E-mail Address:
Customer: tdn
Phone Number:
TrueBlue member: N
PNR:
Departure City:
Destination City:
Flight Date:
Flight Number:
Urgent: N
Crewmember:
LevelOne: Inflight Service
LevelTwo: Other
LevelThree:
This may seem trivial, but I need you to settle an argument if you can.
Suppose Passenger A has a bad back and must recline his seat or face severe discomfort or pain. Passenger B, sitting behind Passenger A, has long legs and cannot abide the seat in front of him to recline. It causes him severe discomfort or pain. Let's assume that for some reason neither passenger can be relocated. Which passenger has a greater right to a comfort-free ride? Which passenger 'owns' the recline space?
Thanks you for your answer.
As an aside, apparently Spirit airlines seats originally had 2 inches of potential recline, but they have recently reconfigured the seats to be "pre-reclined" 3 inches.
It seems like the non-recliners outnumber the recliners here. It would be nice to take a poll: do the non-recliners not recline because they are comfortable sitting upright or do they not recline on principle so that they stay upright even if it's uncomfortable for them to do so?