I asked a seller to post actual pics of a couple of their Coach listings as they are currently using stock photos.
I wanted the a pic of the creed and I was told that they could tell me what was written on the creed! I then asked for photos (again!) and was told that when they have time they will post pics. I then said I needed them because of all the fakes on eBay and was sent this reply;
I wanted the a pic of the creed and I was told that they could tell me what was written on the creed! I then asked for photos (again!) and was told that when they have time they will post pics. I then said I needed them because of all the fakes on eBay and was sent this reply;
So it seems to me that this seller thinks that if it's a cheaper price they can list it as an authentic Coach bag and it's the buyer's fault if they believe the listing to be true!Yes, I understand but the reality of the situation on ebay is that people are listing $200.00 Chloe bag or other so called designer bags for much less and these retail for $2000.00 - $4000.00 in the stoes. The quailty copy is so good that they do say it's the genuine article. But does it really make any sense that unless it's a fake or stolen that you would part with a $3000.00 for $200.00 or so on ebay. There lies the error that people actually believe that they can get something on ebay for 1/10 of the actual price. Same with this coach bag it's over $300.00 retail.
Thanks