They weren't willing to pay me in bags! :lolots::lolots:
They are being very secretive, but it is apparently..... a woman all men will know!
Hmmmm
Oh boy now I'm curious ... I hope it's not Victoria B
Last edited:
They weren't willing to pay me in bags! :lolots::lolots:
They are being very secretive, but it is apparently..... a woman all men will know!
Hmmmm
I feel quite sad about Mulberry I'm sure this isn't what Roger Saul and his wife envisaged when they started the brand.
For the last few days I have tried really hard (I have now worked out) to fall in love with another brand as all the controversy with Mulberry was putting me off a bit.
My designer bag habit started in 1990 when I bought my first LV (which I still own). I bought the odd Mulberry here and there starting with a small congo Zinia which I loved, but didn't really fall in love. For the last few years I have abandoned LV and exclusively loved Mulberry (apart form the odd Le Pliage here and there!) Whereas I completely disagree wholeheartedly with the regular price hikes and the muddle there seems to be at the top regarding direction I still love my Mulberries and enjoy carrying them. They tick all the boxes for me and I seem to be lucky in that I have had nothing but excellent experiences in store, in outlets and from online sales and customer services, despite being quite a demanding customer (so my DH tells me, often in a very embarrassed way!) I have also had no quality issues either so maybe this is clouding my judgement a little. I'm sure if I had had any hassle then I would probably think differently
This may be idealistic and probably not the most financially sensible way to look at it but I see Mulberry as going through a bit of a crisis anbd a down time. Mulberry has been with me for a good few years and its like a friend who needs a bit of help through a tough time. I know its been brought on by the change in direction\management but I'd like Mulberry to come through it and see that they need to return to their best market (like the Roxanne, Phoebe etc days). I would hate to see it fail completely and be another originally good brand which disappears
Hope that made some sense??
I must admit that I'm not surprised.
The new bags don't seem as popular as the older designs, the quality is an absolute disgrace and dealing with customer service is like pulling teeth - and that's not okay when dealing with a premium brand.
I've been a loyal customer for very long, but after having several issues with the quality and service provided, I've lost a lot of faith in the brand.
Looking at the products they are currently offering (and taking the quality and service into consideration), I'm not sure I'd miss Mulberry very much if they went out of business now.
Oh Icy like you I don't want to see the brand disappear. I love my bags too and get lots of pleasure from carrying them.I feel quite sad about Mulberry I'm sure this isn't what Roger Saul and his wife envisaged when they started the brand.
For the last few days I have tried really hard (I have now worked out) to fall in love with another brand as all the controversy with Mulberry was putting me off a bit.
My designer bag habit started in 1990 when I bought my first LV (which I still own). I bought the odd Mulberry here and there starting with a small congo Zinia which I loved, but didn't really fall in love. For the last few years I have abandoned LV and exclusively loved Mulberry (apart form the odd Le Pliage here and there!) Whereas I completely disagree wholeheartedly with the regular price hikes and the muddle there seems to be at the top regarding direction I still love my Mulberries and enjoy carrying them. They tick all the boxes for me and I seem to be lucky in that I have had nothing but excellent experiences in store, in outlets and from online sales and customer services, despite being quite a demanding customer (so my DH tells me, often in a very embarrassed way!) I have also had no quality issues either so maybe this is clouding my judgement a little. I'm sure if I had had any hassle then I would probably think differently
This may be idealistic and probably not the most financially sensible way to look at it but I see Mulberry as going through a bit of a crisis anbd a down time. Mulberry has been with me for a good few years and its like a friend who needs a bit of help through a tough time. I know its been brought on by the change in direction\management but I'd like Mulberry to come through it and see that they need to return to their best market (like the Roxanne, Phoebe etc days). I would hate to see it fail completely and be another originally good brand which disappears
Hope that made some sense??
Up this morning...so their hype worked but will it translate into sale
I've just bought some shares at 675p. Could have gotten them slightly lower a few days ago but I think this is still a decent price. I don't think there's money to be gained in the short term, but am cautiously optimistic about mid-long term outlook.
I'm not hugely keen on the Cara collection but I think the hype is capable of generating interest for a little while. The "it bag" has always been an elusive, unpredictable creature and backpacks are in at the moment - for better or worse - so it's not outside the realm of possibility that this line could sell well. (Or it could bomb, who knows.) IMO a new head of creative in the next few months will probably boost share price a little, regardless of who they are. 31 March 2014 results will be out around May/June, which I personally don't think will affect the share price too much since the market has already adjusted to the profit warning.
Most importantly I don't think Guillon is going anywhere in the short term. The majority shareholders bought a chunk of shares immediately after the profit warning/share tumble; more than anything else I think that is a public demonstration of their willingness to stick to his strategy for now. In hindsight perhaps the aggressive up-branding wasn't the best path to take, but the company is firmly on that track now, so it would be better to see it through rather than quitting halfway and backpedal, especially since they've pretty much burned their bridges with alienating the UK market.