They don't claim to be the lowest price out there. If they are cheaper elsewhere don't buy from Gilt. It's not their fault you didn't check other stores first.
I've said it before, but I'll say it again, these sites prey on the limited quantity aspect, which is what drives the consumer to make a quick decision to purchase a product that they haven't researched. The individual feels like they will be missing out since there are only a few limited quantities, hence why these sites do so well. The only thing I can suggest would be to put an item in your basket and then take your 15 mins that you have before the cart empties itself and do some online comparison shopping to see if there is a better price for the item.
As for the discrepancy over the word sale, not only does it mean the ability to purchase goods at a discounted price, but it also refers to the exchange of goods or services for an amount of money or its equivalent. In some cases, such as the HOH sale, Gilt merely acts as the medium for you to get your purchase since they are not discounting the item. I could be wrong, but I don't see a claim anywhere on their website that they're selling items at a discounted rate. This is implied, due to the flash sale aspect of the site, but I don't see a single thing posted on their website that they offer items for a discounted rate. This could have been up before, but I don't see it now.
The only thing I can suggest would be to put an item in your basket and then take your 15 mins that you have before the cart empties itself and do some online comparison shopping to see if there is a better price for the item.
but I'll put something in my basket and then get on the internet and see if I can confirm that the sales price is a good deal.
and if unsure, I place it in my cart and double check.
Wow, my post never said I expected the lowest price, I simply stated that my expectations were that I would pay lower than retail. Fortunately, the US has moved away from such a cavalier caveat emptor attitude and there are more consumer protections.
I get what you are saying and why you are unhappy, but you yourself said you bought without checking pricing elsewhere. You can't assume the price is below retail for every single sale. The HOH sale wasn't posted as a below-retail sale, it was some sort of exclusive opportunity to purchase at retail.
Overall the majority, if not 99% of gilt sales are below retail. They occasionally do an exclusive sale which the deal is the designer offering an array of items, but may be at full price.
I don't think in this instance they did anything wrong. It was stated that HOH was going to be full retail. And also, you get 15 minutes to hold the Item in your cart. A quick google would have given you time o check the price.
I do hope you are able to enjoy your jewelry piece.
I too understand what you are saying but this is my point:
1. Gilt Groupe holds itself out to be a sale site. I should haven't to pay atttention to small nuances to determine if I am getting a bargin or not.
2. The CS representative I spoke with tried to tell me that it was stated that HOH was going to be full retail. When I pressed her to show me the screen shot, she came back five minutes later acknowledging that it was not expressly stated. Furthermore, it was not an exclusive look at her line because apparently it has already been out in department stores which by the way already have pieces as sale items.
Overall lesson, do the research before purchasing from Gilt Groupe. I didn't start this thread to argue, but to inform others that have been mislead or could be mislead by this company and to get some feedback. Thanks you ladies for all of your feedback.
Their website touts that it is a sale site with discounts of up to 70% and member's only pricing. Apparently, member's only pricing means retail and I certainly do not have to be a member of their site to pay retail prices. All in all, it is misleading (despite doing my reasearch or not).
Yes, you should. You should be a responsible, informed consumer; we all should be.
I'm sorry that you are not satisfied with Gilt and their pricing policies, but we as consumers have the choice to buy or not buy.
I'm not sure how not that makes me irresponsible? Also, suggestions to the effect of not shopping there or the choice to buy or not buy are not constructive at all. Those points are obvious and overlook the fact that there are consumer protections out there. They have been installed for a reason.
How is it not constructive? You have the choice to shop with Gilt or not shop with Gilt. If you choose not to, then you won't be subject to what you feel is the misrepresentation and pricing of their items.
Consumer protection is not around so that the masses can blindly purchase whatever from whomever without so much as product/pricing knowledge. Example: Let's say I want to buy a flat screen. Store X sells said flat screen for $2k and guarantees rock bottom pricing. Store Y sells the same TV for $1500. I don't research or comparison shop and purchase from Store X. Then, I see an ad for Store Y and notice that I have overpaid by $500. Do I call in the FTC? No. It's my fault for not having researched.
I am sorry to hear that you are not satisfied with Gilt; however, I just don't see the point in being angry about their pricing.