Will this soft Chanel bag hold its shape?

I just purchased this Chanel bag today. In reality it looks much better than in photos. It’s spacious and the chain length is fully adjustable which is quite nice because I’m petite.

But does anyone have experience with this slouchy soft type of a bag? Will it hold shape after awhile? That’s my only concern. Thank you!

E3D7B6B5-72D4-4665-B365-1F3F3AD8D8E4.jpeg

01DC8CFF-785C-42E9-96BB-12872E6016D8.jpeg

500148DC-EE27-4328-A886-94311E9C2084.jpeg

  • Poll Poll
Interlocking love necklace diamonds vs small pave love ring

Interlocking love necklace diamonds vs small pave love ring

  • Interlocking love necklace YG

    Votes: 13 43.3%
  • Pave small ring YG

    Votes: 17 56.7%

Hi! I am thinking of purchasing the love interlocking necklace with diamonds or a small love pave ring both in yellow gold. Any suggestions? Would love some input from those who have these pieces for every day use. Thank you.

How to make bathtime more luxurious?

A milk bath is a bath taken in milk instead of water.

There are legends that Cleopatra bathed in goat milk daily for her complexion.
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milk_bath#History

Soap bars:
Creed Aventus:
20200511-soap-06.jpg


Christian Dior Eau Sauvage:
20200117-soap-01.jpg


Chanel Coco Mademoiselle:
20200117-soap-04.jpg


Tom Ford Oud Wood:
w2000_q60.jpg


Toiletries:
Acqua di Parma
Bulgari
L’Occitane
Molton Brown
Salvatore Ferragamo

P.S. I'm not affiliated with them.

What happened to LVLENKA?

Literally was just printing a shipping label to send my purse to her and went back to our IG chat for her address and her profile is gone!

Ironically, I was just on her website where it says, "Consignment has moved to instagram!
To make our consignment services even easier, we have moved everything to our Instagram."

And I thought to myself, "putting all your eggs in one basket, she's not maintaining control of her business by making IG her only platform, what if they take it down?" And literally 5 seconds later, I see that her IG is taken down.

I'm obviously going to hold off shipping my bag to her now! But curious if anyone knows why IG has removed her.

Moisturising, Non-sparkly Lip Gloss Recommendations

So, it would appear that they have discontinued my Lancome Juicy Tubes lipgloss in both Melon and Melon Rewind, which obviously means I need to find a similar replacement.

The replacement needs to be creamy, moisturising, non-sparkly/shimmering and in a natural type of pinkish red colour similar to the Melon.

Can be very slightly darker, but not too dark.

Clinique Pop Plush Creamy Lip Gloss in Airkiss looks promising, but I'm not sure if it has shimmer in it, or not?

The Airkiss colour in their previous Glosswear lipgloss did have shimmer in it, which is why I'm hesitating.

Also, if the replacement could smell/taste pleasant (not too sweet/strong) that would be a bonus.

Thanks in advance.

Le Sigh....Up for Auction: Flawless 303.10 ct Canary Diamond

1668716374483.png

Accompanied by the Smithsonian magazine from May 1988, featuring an article on the diamond.



A diamond of any size requires an extraordinarily improbable combination of factors simply to exist. With that backdrop, the Golden Canary is nothing short of miraculous. Weighing over 303 carats, it is one of the largest cut diamonds in the world and
the largest flawless or internally flawless diamond ever graded by the GIA.



Making up a vanishingly small number of all diamonds mined, yellow diamonds are significantly rarer than their colorless counterparts. Fancy yellow diamonds make up just .006% of all diamonds mined, and of these, only a tiny percentage will be internally flawless. With its impressive combination of size and saturation, the Golden Canary is quite literally unprecedented.



Thanks to a unique convergence of high temperature and pressure 100 miles under the Earth’s surface, carbon atoms are forced into incomparably tight covalent bonds. Over billions of years in this environment, a diamond is formed. It is during this process that nitrogen atoms can become incorporated into the diamond’s chemistry, causing the diamond to produce a yellow bodycolor. Violent and rapid volcanic eruptions then bring the diamonds to the earth’s crust, where they await their discovery. Accordingly, the chances of any diamond crystal surviving these forces and, furthermore, being discovered, are truly miniscule.



The story of the Golden Canary’s discovery is as captivating as it is improbable.



In the early 1980s, a young girl playing near her uncle’s house in Mbuji Mayi, in modern-day ********ic Republic of Congo, found a large golden-colored stone in a pile of rocks. At the time, miners from the nearby MIBA diamond mine had considered the rubble too bulky to be diamond-bearing and had discarded it. That piece of unassuming rubble turned out to be an 890-carat rough diamond, one of the largest roughs the world had ever seen. The girl gave the stone to her uncle, who, in turn, sold it to local diamond dealers.



By 1984, it was first presented to the public, displayed alongside the world’s most legendary and mythologized diamonds at the Smithsonian’s National Museum of Natural History. The
Washington Post heralded it as “the largest uncut, rough diamond known to exist in the world today – a flawless 890-carat ‘fancy intense’ golden-yellow diamond” and speculated about what shape cutters would choose and what its value might be.



The rough diamond immediately sparked global interest. Beyond its nearly unforeseen size, its unique internal characteristics beguiled viewers. Ian Balfour, in his seminal treatise,
Famous Diamonds, rhapsodized: “…the crystal had been composed of sharply defined areas of different colours, each colour representing some change in the environment that must have occurred as the crystal was growing. At one stage, the crystal had been colourless; then nature had added a certain thickness of pale yellow diamond, followed by a ‘skin’ of smoky amber-coloured diamond.”



Balancing these characteristics, the cutters had to weigh the benefits of producing a larger cut stone against those of optimizing its color and clarity. The cutting process took four years as a team considered various options and carefully planned its strategy with a sense of heavy responsibility. In an article about the diamond’s cutting process published in Smithsonian magazine in May 1988, P. F. Kluge quotes the head of the cutting team, “When I was in Florence, I visited Michelangelo’s
David…. A diamond has more value in a rough state than a piece of marble. Marble can be a floor, a table, an ashtray – or a David. Now we have a magnificent piece of diamond, one of the largest ever found, and I have only one shot at it. Michelangelo could find another piece of marble. Michelangelo could have another shot.”



Ultimately, they opted to transform the rough into 15 finished stones. The largest of the resulting diamonds, known as the “Incomparable,” tipped the scales at 407.48 carats and was graded by the GIA as Internally Flawless, Fancy Deep Brownish Yellow. The shield-shaped step cut, with its unusually shaped facets and small table preserved much of the shape and bulk of the original rough. It was the largest internally flawless or flawless diamond ever graded by the laboratory.



The Incomparable soon became a star attraction at museums around the world. In 1997 it featured in The Nature of Diamonds at the American Museum of Natural History in New York together with famous diamonds such as the Eureka, the Krupp, and the Tiffany Yellow as well as historical treasures including the Imperial Crown of Peter the Great and Empress Eugénie of France’s diamond current-leaf corsage. Four years later, the Incomparable appeared in the exhibit
Diamants at the Musée National d’Histoire Naturelle in Paris alongside the Sancy diamonds, the Star of South Africa, and jewels from the royal collections of many nations. The Incomparable was also included in an exhibition that toured The Royal Ontario Museum and the Houston Museum of Science in 2008.



In recent years, the decision was made to recut the Incomparable to improve its color and shape. The result, the Golden Canary, remains impressive in size and now boasts a brighter hue and more elegant profile. The laboratory’s appendix letter explains, “The re-cut of the Incomparable to the current 303.10-carat pear modified brilliant is to look at the diamond as new; a re-creation bringing to bear the advances in technology, computer modeling and visual evaluation available today. Everything from the orientation of the stone, to its shape and cutting style, has been considered. As a modified brilliant, the color appearance now displays active twinkling yellow spots of light against a golden background. Indeed, today there are members of the trade who use the vernacular term “golden” when referring to this overall appearance.”



At 303.10 carats, the Golden Canary remains the largest internally flawless diamond in the world. As it rightfully claims its spot in the pantheon of exceptional diamonds, Sotheby’s is honored to help write the next chapter for this incomparable, reborn gem.


Which Birkin?

Hi Everyone, I'm new to posting in the Hermes forum although I've been reading many of your wonderful conversations! I'm choosing my first (although I know not last) birkin and I've managed to become very confused. I've chosen the pre-loved route partially bc I'm impatient and partially because I just had a baby so it's hard to get out and start the buying of hermes things in earnest (to hopefully be offered a quota bag at some point-- this is my end goal but I know it will take time). I ordered a rouge casque togo 35 birkin with gold hardware which I was really happy about until I inspected the corners. It was not listed that it had been painted at all but it looks to me like the corners have been painted. Can you please weigh in on whether you think they look painted and also whether it's worth it to pay over 11,000 for a birkin that has painted corners? Would you keep it? I know this is rather subjective but would love the benefit of your opinions.

I also ordered a raisin togo 35 birkin with palladium hardware. It's from 2007 and the handles are definitely a bit gummy and it's more worn than the RC birkin (RC is 2017). The piping is worn and showing through on the raisin as well but I believe it hasn't been painted (although please let me know if it should be a different color in the worn piping- like white or something). The raisin color seems amazingly versatile and I've read so many of the threads on here about raisin birkins which inspired me to order it. I paid shy of 10,000 for it. I'm not sure whether to hold out for a better condition one or just use this one and enjoy that I'll be less worried about it. Please share your thoughts with me, what would you do in this spot? I really appreciate it :)

Just a note: I like to have bags that are just a little different, so that's why I've chosen color rather than a black or etoupe or something much more neutral.

Also, please excuse the somewhat shoddy photos, my newborn has fallen asleep for a few minutes and that pile of laundry that you see is blocking the sunlight from being in her face, haha.
IMG_0247.jpgIMG_0249.jpgIMG_0251.jpgIMG_0241.jpgIMG_0242.jpgIMG_0244.jpgIMG_0245.jpgIMG_0246.jpg



Thank you so much!

Mansur Gavriel Mansur Gavriel Small Zip Tote opinion?

Hello there,

I am thinking of getting a MG small zip tote. But seems not many reviews on this bag. The thing is I am a bit aware of the alleged quality issue with MG in general, so I never considered a MG bag. Until now...The small zip tote (not the regular small tote) just seems fit my need: right size, right colour, with a zip to secure my stuff. Feel like a perfect tote for a day trip or workbag. But if it's going to get scratched easily or even falling apart soon, I don't think I will even bother. So if anyone had one could comment on the quality/functionality of this bag, would be great! Thanks a lot!
  • Like
Reactions: Mirus’ Dream

  • Poll Poll
Small JUC with small LB or regular LB ???

Small JUC with small LB or regular LB

  • Small LB

    Votes: 16 38.1%
  • Regular LB

    Votes: 26 61.9%

Hi Everyone -
I just purchased regular love bracelet and small JUC. I can’t sleep at night as I think I have made a bad decision . I think small love looks better with small JUC (also I am a petite person).
SA adviced to get 15 size JUC and 16 LB - wrist size 13.5) I think the size I was recommended is too big for me but was told I can’t return. I just have to live with it..I haven’t put my love bracelet on since I bought it and wearing JUC on its own..
Please let me know what set you prefer, maybe one day I will take my LB out.. xxx

139FCDA7-56F5-4709-97BA-10F52F748729.jpeg

B17C662C-0159-4652-BD6D-06D794D64669.jpeg
  • Love
Reactions: skyqueen
Top