Welcome to The Purse Forum, the Internet's #1 community for handbag lovers and shoulder fashion fetishists! Over 150,000 members have contributed over 8 million posts in 339,000+ threads about the hottest 'it' bags of the seasons, they've evaluated eBay sellers and other online stores and discussed a variety of other topics...

You currently are not logged in and are viewing the Purse Forum as a guest. This enables you to read most of our content. If you would like to actively participate in current threads or create your own, view or post pictures, vote in polls, privately interact with any of our members or use all the other features of this site, you will need to register for free with a valid email address and a user name of choice. Join our fast growing community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Aug 21st, 2008, 06:23 PM   #1
Pixie Duster
 
twinkle.tink's Avatar
 
Location: Just call me Tink ;)
Arrow Intresting article about Mattel suit against bratz.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080821/...u/mattel_bratz

House of Barbie seeks nearly $2B in Bratz fight

By GILLIAN FLACCUS, Associated Press Writer Thu Aug 21, 1:52 AM ET

RIVERSIDE, Calif. - Grown men argued over dolls for six hours as they wrapped up a federal trial pitting the maker of the pouty-lipped Bratz dolls against the house of Barbie — a lawsuit that could cost upstart MGA Entertainment Inc. up to $2 billion.
ADVERTISEMENT

Millions of dollars are at stake in Mattel Inc.'s copyright infringement case, but in the trial's final hours lawyers instead asked jurors to think like children and sparred over the placement of beauty moles and the plumpness of glossy, heart-shaped lips.

The jury ruled last month in the trial's first phase that the dolls' designer, Carter Bryant, came up with the Bratz concept while working for Mattel. The jury also found that Los Angeles-based MGA aided in the breach of contract, and its chief executive, Isaac Larian, played a role in the deal.

The case went to the jury late Wednesday and deliberations will begin Thursday afternoon. Jurors must decide what, if any, damages they should award Mattel and whether they should also award unspecified punitive damages.

Earlier Wednesday, in his closing arguments, Mattel attorney John Quinn said MGA owed Mattel at least $1 billion in Bratz profits and interest, while Larian owed nearly $800 million for his complicity.

Quinn said that the four original Bratz dolls were virtually identical to Bryant's conceptual sketches and that all other Bratz-related products — and their profits — also belonged to Mattel.

He flipped through photos of Bryant's drawings and compared them to the packaged Bratz dolls that debuted in 2001. He pointed out nearly identical outfits, similar backpacks and a tiny mole that appeared on one doll's cheek in the drawing and on the final product.

"The only question is, is the finished product when it comes to market substantially similar to the original drawing?" he said. "You have to judge this not from the standpoint of a professional (doll) sculptor ... but from the standpoint of a child. That's the law."

MGA attorneys countered that the jury should award Mattel as little as $30 million because MGA had built the doll line's value with smart additions, branding and packaging.

MGA attorney Thomas Nolan said the company made crucial decisions about the Bratz look that weren't included in Bryant's specs. Without the changes, Bratz would have been a bust, he said.

"The evidence is uncontroverted that the drawings portray older, edgier, sexier dolls," he said. "The eyebrows were way too aggressive, the lips way too pronounced, the face way too harsh. What (MGA) made is a prettier doll that could compete."

The original four dolls expanded to nearly 40 Bratz characters, MGA said, and that drove sales among girls who had to have the latest model.

Attorney Raoul Kennedy, representing MGA, mocked the idea that a little girl would be content with just the first doll inspired by Bryant's original sketches and not later characters developed by MGA's team.

"Can you see a parent saying to their child, 'Why do you want that? You have a 'substantially similar' doll back home," Kennedy said.

He noted the four original Bratz dolls brought a combined $81 million in revenue, while a later-generation theme doll called Bratz Play Sportz brought in $73 million alone.

"Something else is going on besides Mattel's property in contributing to sales," Kennedy said. "Themes make a difference."

Quinn, however, said MGA had never had a hit toy before Bratz and lost more than $6 million in 2000, the year before the line of saucy dolls came on the market with their "anime-style" eyes and revealing outfits.

MGA has since made profits of nearly $778 million on Bratz, which exploded in popularity among "tweens" — girls 7 to 12, he said. The highly stylized fashion dolls have oversized feet, heads and hands, curling lashes and huge, almond-shaped eyes daubed with exotic-colored eyeshadow.

Sales of Barbie, a near right-of-passage in American girlhood, have slid since Bratz's Yasmin, Cloe, Jade and Sasha came on the scene seven years ago. Since then, MGA has introduced a number of spin-offs and related products, including Bratz Boyz, Bratz Petz and Baby Bratz, as well as glitzy outfits and accessories that go with each character.

Domestic sales of Barbie were down 15 percent in 2007 and 12 percent in the first quarter of 2008, while international sales increased 6 percent in 2008 as opposed to 12 percent the previous year.

"In history, there have only been two successful fashion dolls — Barbie and Bratz — and Mr. Larian and Mr. Bryant stole one of those," Quinn said. "The numbers are what they are ... and the law says when you profit by taking someone else's confidential information, you have to give it back."
__________________


twinkle.tink is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 21st, 2008, 09:59 PM   #2
Sentient Post Whore
 
ShimmaPuff's Avatar
 
Location: Earth
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by twinkle.tink View Post
"You have to judge this not from the standpoint of a professional (doll) sculptor ... but from the standpoint of a child. That's the law."..."The evidence is uncontroverted that the drawings portray older, edgier, sexier dolls,"
Then Mattel loses, because Bratz are totally way younger than Barbie, not to mention cooler, from the standpoint of every child I know who has either. And from mine, and although my occupation may be different today, I did spend several years as a child, so mine also counts, and Mattel can bite me.
ShimmaPuff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 21st, 2008, 10:08 PM   #3
Santa Baby
 
caitlin1214's Avatar
 
Location: Toronto, Canada (Eh?)
Default

If by "oldier, edgier, sexier dolls" they mean "dressed like whores" then yes. Yes, they are.
__________________

And this above all: to thine ownself be true, and it must follow, as the night the day, thou canst not then be false to any man.
Polonius, Hamlet Act I, sc iii
caitlin1214 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 22nd, 2008, 12:13 AM   #4
Merry X-mas Y'all!
 
Taralindsey's Avatar
 
Location: TX
Default

I hate those bratz dolls.. my girls will never own one!
__________________
Wishlist:
Large Signature Carly
Madison Julianne (magenta?)
Taralindsey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 22nd, 2008, 03:21 AM   #5
♥'s Cupcakes
 
Lvbabydoll's Avatar
 
Location: California
Default

Hmm...
I grew up with Barbie but I do like Bratz as well now. They remind me of anime characters with their exaggerated features.
This will be an interesting story to follow.
__________________

My Collection!(slideshows on p. 95).
My other addiction-Juicy Couture charms! (posts 1779, 1780)

Please visit my Etsy site, www.RitzeeRebel.etsy.com (or here for more pics) for my felt pins!
Lvbabydoll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 22nd, 2008, 12:10 PM   #6
Pixie Duster
 
twinkle.tink's Avatar
 
Location: Just call me Tink ;)
Default

The Jury has already decided Carter was indeed still under contract at Mattel when he designed Bratz....now they are deliberating about damages.

I find it ironic, that Mattel has always been so litigious in it's defense of Barbie considering Ruth Handler copied the Bild Lili Doll in the first place. Although, Mattel did eventually reach a settlement and officially acquire the rights to Lili in 1964. As much as I do love Barbie, I have always thought this was their dirty little secret.

We all know Mattel is not above copying other ideas when it suits them.

Jem....>barbie and the rockers

Tiffany Taylor....>superstar barbie

Bratz.....> my scene Barbies
__________________


twinkle.tink is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 22nd, 2008, 01:55 PM   #7
Sim Simma
 
ayla's Avatar
 
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Default

If the designer was still under contract, perhaps they will just award disgorgement - e.g. all profits now belong to Mattel. It seems weird that they could potentially award more money than the company has earned on the dolls - if anything, they should just take the profits and then force them into a licensing agreement with royalty payments back to Mattel.

What a bummer for the Bratz people though, look carefully at your employment contracts !
__________________
ayla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 23rd, 2008, 02:50 PM   #8
Member
 
Jahpson's Avatar
 
Location: The Playground
Default

Bratz dolls are the ugliest thing I have ever seen. yuck.

I grew up with Barbie and will always be a loyal fan, even for my future daugthers.
__________________
Amazingly Sophisticated




Happy Holidays to all my TPF friends!
Jahpson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 23rd, 2008, 03:41 PM   #9
hAppy JUMPER
 
Liberté's Avatar
 
Default

I think it will be very interesting to see how this turns out. The amount of damages they have to pay will let us know if the company will really be "punished" or not. THis hasen't really got anything to do with whether the doll looks bad, is a bad role model or not.

To all of do not like this, this is a fun parody of hte concept of the bratz dool =P



Part 2 (even funnier)

__________________


disco BUMPER
Liberté is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 28th, 2008, 03:16 PM   #10
Got a handle on it
 
BagLadie's Avatar
 
Location: Red Sox Nation
Default

I would never buy a Bratz doll for my daughter. Just the name of them "bratz" bothers me.
__________________
One good thing about music, when it hits you, you feel no pain.
- Bob Marley
BagLadie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 28th, 2008, 03:24 PM   #11
Member
 
Default

While I understand that it is printed in employment contracts of most major corporations, I find it ridiculous that any thoughts or ideas an employee has while employed by that company automatically belong to the company. It just seems preposterous to me to say, "Not only do your working hours belong to us, but every creative idea you might generate belongs to us, as well."

The two dolls are so different as to not cause any confusion between them, but if the case is based on whether the doll's creator came up with the idea while under contract with Mattel, then that is an entirely different matter.
HauteMama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 28th, 2008, 06:21 PM   #12
Young, Fab and Broke
 
Juicy's Avatar
 
Location: England
Default

Liberte - those videos are brilliant!!! I hate Bratz dolls, they are disgusting and promote all the wrong things! I wouldn't allow my child to have Bratz!
__________________
I Balenciaga


(\_/)
(O.o)
(> <) This is Bunny. Copy Bunny into your signature to help him on his way to world domination.
Juicy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 30th, 2008, 10:56 PM   #13
Obsessed Much?
 
elli's Avatar
 
Location: iPodland
Default

I was 8 years old when Bratz first came out, and I don't remember why but they were DEFINITELY cooler than Barbies. I never actually owned one though, just played with my friends...
__________________
elli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 31st, 2008, 05:52 AM   #14
Sentient Post Whore
 
ShimmaPuff's Avatar
 
Location: Earth
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elli View Post
I was 8 years old when Bratz first came out, and I don't remember why but they were DEFINITELY cooler than Barbies. I never actually owned one though, just played with my friends...
Because Barbies are so old school and old ladies collect them, which in a very few years, will also be true of Bratz, and kids will want whatever the hot new doll is, not a pokey collected-by-old-ladies yesterdoll like Bratz!
ShimmaPuff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 2nd, 2008, 11:50 PM   #15
Member
 
Florasun's Avatar
 
Default

Liberte the slutz videos are hilarious! thanks for sharing!
__________________
The most important things in life aren't things at all!
Florasun is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Purse Forum » The Playground » Up to the Minute...  

Thread Tools



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:24 AM.