luvmilo said:
so in ur opinion.. fakers have not been able to make a fake thats so hard to tell from the real one yet?
they have been doing it for so long... i just wonder
how about date code? fake date codes make sense?
Well sometimes, they tend to use the same date code on all their fakes, no matter when it was ACTUALLY made. For example, just today, I was on the "authenticate this" board and there was a Mizi, which only just came out last year, with a date of April 2000. Sometimes I think people don't really pay much attention to date codes so they just make something up, say it's got a date code and slap it in there.
I think when most of these sites say the bags are mirror image, they use pictures of authentic bags, then send you a fake that's NOT anything like the real ones. I've yet to see a fake that looks exactly like the authentic ones, detail for detail.
It's because the ones that claim to be mirror image cost a LOT more to produce and use "better" (if you can call it that) materials, so they can cost upwards of $200! And most people who buy fakes don't want to spend that much on a bag anyway, so even if they DO make bags that are really close, I doubt many people have them.
Like I said, I haven't seen one that would actually fool me yet.