I ordered the *tivoli inspired bag* the other day and it has nothing to do with whether or not I can afford LV. I've owned Chanels, Pradas, LV's, etc and I have learned that I'm no happier carrying a $3,000 bag than I am carrying one that costs me $300.
I don't understand the reasoning behind some of the comments I've seen that seem to think LV has the market on certain styles. That's like saying no one but Hanes is allowed to manufacture a white t-shirt. Ridiculous.
Yeah, I'm kind of confused about this, too. Rioni bags honestly don't even look that much like LV bags to me. If they did, I probably wouldn't like them because I've never been a fan of LV.
If all the outrage is over the Boston bag then I really don't see what the big deal is. The design of that bag is totally different. There's a zipper on the outside and pockets on both ends, not to mention the R's all over the bag. And if it's the general shape there are approx 400,000 bags out there of all different designers with that general satchel shape. LV doesn't own that. In fact no one owns it because designs can't be copyrighted.