|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#31 | ||||
|
Fall is here!
Joined: Oct 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 11,049
|
But seriously -- why not take the money and just withdraw the interest to buy the desired items? That way you keep your $10K AND you get to purchase the items! And the money keeps coming in to buy more stuff! Kind of like the goose that lays the golden eggs, KWIM? |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Built Hot for LV
Joined: Oct 2007
Location: That's ME ^_^
Posts: 14,739
|
rolex and bag..
|
|
__________________
All so LoVely, so little time to get them all
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 120
|
It pays to be careful with one's money, but with interest rates being what they are, the OP would have to wait many, many years to collect enough interest to buy something substantial like she wants.
If she took the $10,000 and opened a CD account at a rate of 1.99% for 3 years, her APY would amount to only 2% meaning that she would have earned $613.61 in interest, minus applicable taxes. Not really a good yield IMO. Assuming she already has a sizable savings or investment portfolio, she might as well buy a Birkin. |
|
Last edited by k*d; Jul 1st, 2009 at 07:27 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 794
|
Although the Kelly is the "it bag", I would get the rolex instead because for the watch, you can wear it everyday. Rolex is more versatile and you have more usage of it. I wear both of my rolexes almost everday. If you already had 1 or 2 rolex, then get the bag. Otherwise, defintely go for the watch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 28
|
$10k on a bag/watch/other material object?? Put the money in the bank. I'm all about nice items but at some point you have to be realistic.
And you can get MUCH better interests rates than 1.99% if you look. |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 120
|
As for being realistic about how much to spend on luxury items, I think that's all relative. Most PFers have a higher standard of living than most people in the U.S. Either that, or they just have a higher debt to savings ratio. Assuming that the OP falls into the first category, I don't see the harm in a Rolex or Birkin. |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
save mode..on.
Joined: Aug 2006
Location: In the playground
Posts: 8,445
|
|
|
__________________
NOTE TO SELF: SELF, YOU WILL NOT SPEND UNNECESSARILY!!!
|
|
|
|
|