|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#16 |
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,332
|
^^^ That looks a gorgeous length on you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 485
|
i also prefer mine to be 16 inches. it fits with most of the necklines of my clothes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Location: Emerald City
Posts: 34
|
I think the preference is subjective, like Cornflower Blue said, and it would depend on a few other factors as well:
- Your build (this cannot be simply determined by height, since your neck and shoulder muscles come into play) - What size charm/pendant do you plan to use with the chain? - What shape is the charm/pendant? I am on the petite side (5'5", 105 lbs), but I played volleyball and am muscular around my neck, so there's no way a 16" chain would go as low as it does on Krysta (which looks lovely, by the way). For me a 16" chain sits right underneath the dent btwn my collarbones. I do like that length (16") for petite pendants and own quite a few chains, and I think it works well for lots of their mini-sized charms (1" or less). For bigger pendants, though, I think it would look kind of weird (on me anyway) w/ a 16" chain, as the charm/pendant would be sitting right on top of my chest bone. I recently inherited a blue agate cameo from my mom that is framed in 18K gold, which is about 1.5" in height. For that, I tried on different length chains at Tiffany and settled on an 18" open link gold chain. I like how it hangs lower on my chest. (Maybe a tad lower than Krysta's picture.) I also tried on some of the key charms, and 2" and bigger ones looked strange on a 16" chain on me, because it's a substantial metal stick hanging right from the middle of my collarbones. But if it had been a round gemstone or more flexible pendant, I might have felt differently. So it all depends! IMHO, you can go with 16" if you (or really your neck/shoulders) are on the thin side and are thinking of mini-sized charm; if the pendant is any bigger or if you are average (are we talking American?) size, 18" might look better. It's all up to you tho!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Life♥Love♥LV
Joined: Dec 2008
Location: in Iggy land!
Posts: 1,246
|
I need 18". I'm 5'3" but feel like I have a short neck so the 18 works great!
|
|
__________________
"We can judge the of a man by his treatment of animals." ~ Immanual Kant![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 57
|
For me it depends on what kind of neckline I'm wearing. If I'm wearing something with a higher neck, such as a crew neck, I like the 16". However, if I'm wearing something that shows more chest, such as a v-neck, then I prefer the 18"...seems to fill more of the "negative space" that the lower neckline gives.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
"Hello Lover..."
Joined: Jun 2009
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 205
|
I find that 18 is a better length for me. 16 just feels too short. I'm about 5'7 average build. I think I might have a long torso, which is why 16 just feels like it's a child's neclace... I like the longer length, plus, usually the pendants on 18 are large, and I pull that look off better... ie...
I've got the folllowing in 18" The bean pendant by elsa peretti The open heart pendant by elsa peretti |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Location: Greensboro NC
Posts: 125
|
Does anyone like wearing both 16 and 18 together for that layered look? I am getting the snow flake necklace and was thinking of getting a 16 to layer it with another necklace.
|
|
__________________
Own LV Galliera PM mono 2/14/09 LV Speedy 30 Damier Ebony 7/18/09 ![]() Gucci medium beige/ebony tattoo tote A few cute Coach ![]() Lovin my Coach Ali ![]() Wish list LV Neo Cabby mm LV Palermo gm/pm? LV Speedy 30 mono LV Tivoli Gucci Sukey Coach...honestly...I have too many to list Feel free to PM me if you see any good deals!
|
|
|
|
|