|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#16 |
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,880
|
carlinha I would keep it simple. A solitare like yours should be appreciated for its beauty and shouldnt let micropave or anything else take away from it. it is gorgeous!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: up in the gym workin on my fitness
Posts: 2,736
|
The diamond eternity band will definitely add to the sparkle factor. Congrats again babe :)
|
|
__________________
Jeneen ![]() ![]() ![]() Stop searching forever, happiness is just next to you. - dbf's fortune cookie
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
bubblehead
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,888
|
glad you are keeping it as is - it's stunning and I think on such amazing stones a lot of busy-ness takes away from the impact of the stone!
|
|
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Just me...
Joined: Aug 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,103
|
Gorgeous ring!!! I agree. . . keep it simple.
|
|
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,879
|
I love it plain and simple just the way it is! Congratulations!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Location: Cali
Posts: 2,911
|
Coming from someone who don't usually prefer solitaires, I think this emerald cut looks perfect in this setting. I can't picture it with any other kind of setting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
![]() Joined: Jan 2006
Location: Dallas Area
Posts: 42,709
|
I love the split shank if you are not adding an eternity, but since you are I don't prefer teh 2 together.
I LOVE contrast and because an emerald is so low key - not glittery - I'd contrast it w/ a thin micro-pave setting/band. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Must-not-shop
Joined: Jan 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 356
|
CONGRATS!!
I agree with the others, the emerald looks great alone. 'If' you realllly wanted to change it, perhaps a simple pavé setting might work but Id leave it as is. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,834
|
I agree about leaving the solitaire. Halo settings are big right now, puzzle-type rings that fit together were popular about 10-12 years ago, wide gold bands were big about two decades ago, colored side stones before that, etc. My point is that there will always be trends in jewelry, but a solitaire - especially with a gorgeous, simple, emerald cut - will ALWAYS be fashionable. Jazz it up with a different wedding band if you feel like it, but I'm a big fan of the solitaire setting for the main stone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,400
|
Beautiful ring! Keep it as is, it is stunning! Congratulations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,841
|
Stay the same, I prefer the clean simple setting. I think ECs and Asschers should stay in simple settings. If ANYTHING maybe side baguettes or something.
|
|
__________________
Despite the high cost of living, it remains popular. I LOVE SEWNSATIONAL! ![]() ![]() ![]() Things I want.... -Balenciaga Twiggy -Anna Corinna Jetsetter/Jetsetter Jr. -More Anna Corinna Mini Citys -Mulberry Mabel -Rebecca Minkoff MA/MAM ...it's good to want things. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
LV and Diamonds!
Joined: Jun 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 806
|
I think it's beautiful just the way it is!
|
|
__________________
![]() Check out my collection! http://forum.purseblog.com/louis-vuitton/my-bag-collection-328745.html NO MORE SHOPPING....until the house is remodeled! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Chia Tang
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: eh!!!
Posts: 2,750
|
Mine was plain and I changed it to blinged out and I love it. People often ask me about the setting. I am very happy I changed it.
I say change it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 72
|
I like the simplistic elegance of a solitaire like you have now.
... and I know this wasn't really what you had in mind but I just love this setting for emerald cuts!! http://www.doverjewelry.com/preview/244201.jpg
|
|
__________________
I want to fly and never come down. And live my life, and have friends around. Last edited by R0lyaT390; Jun 23rd, 2009 at 05:54 PM. |
|
|
|
|