|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
yes please
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,738
|
I DID IT! Passed my specialty medical boards.... a culmination of 4 years of college, 4 years of medical school, 4 years of residency, and a 2 year MBA thrown in for fun. It's officially OVER and DONE! So, that said, it's reward time, now that I have a very good job.
I've decided to get diamond studs, and I mean nice ones. One of my friend's mothers is a wholesaler. I talked with her today and she has a few pairs in mind. Now, this is where I get stupid. Please help. The options are (and they are all rounds in white gold): a) 2.71 ctw, I color, one stone with a decent size inclusion (SI2?). $6930. She thinks she could get the one stone swapped out for a nicer one for about $1k more. b) 2.29 ctw, H, SI1 and SI2. $7320. c) 2.62 ctw, H, SI1 and SI2. $10,544. d.) 2.32 ctw, H, SI2. $9482. Mind you, she is across the country, so I can't actually see them. I trust her judgment. She seemed to think that options B and D were the best. To me, the only difference between B and D is a couple of points and $2K! OK, diamond queens, that's the dilemma. What would you do? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 171
|
Do you have any information about the cut of the diamonds? That, to me, is more important than color and clarity.
By the way congrats on passing the boards! |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 52
|
I would pick the one with the best cut quality, that's what will make it sparkle! But from the info you gave...
If A has a decent size inclusion you can see without magnification, its most likely lower than SI2...like an I1 or I2. I don't think the difference between B and D will be noticeable, definitely not worth $2,000! C is expensive...I would go for B unless you really want the bigger size of C and are willing to pay that much for it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() Joined: Jan 2006
Location: Dallas Area
Posts: 46,471
|
I agree, that's great info you have but not nearly as important as find out what the cut level is. Ask her to fax you the certificates to review since you can't see them and post the specs here for us to really help
![]() Just FYI, on your ears, I color and SI2 {depending on where the inclusion is} is totally fine if the cut is ideal. Your eyes will not see the size difference between B & D = 2.29 vs 2.32 = 1.14 vs 1.16/ear. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Location: GA
Posts: 6,472
|
Sounds like B is the best choice, but cut is really the most important.
|
|
__________________
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well-preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, fabulous handbag in one hand, martini in the other, body thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming "WOOHOO, what a ride!"
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 28
|
Congrats.
B seems reasonable. As everyone else has already stated, cut is more important. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Location: tx
Posts: 7,588
|
i love these prices....lucky you can deal with a wholesaler....congrats on passing your boards!
|
|
__________________
pazT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Plays with Balls
Joined: May 2006
Location: WI
Posts: 7,484
|
It sounds like she is very trustworthy though and I think I would just ask what the cut is like on B & D. D might be ideal which is why there is a jump in price. Congrats on passing your boards! Woooo hooo! |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
save mode..on.
Joined: Aug 2006
Location: The Beauty Bar
Posts: 8,888
|
|
|
__________________
NOTE TO SELF: SELF, YOU WILL NOT SPEND UNNECESSARILY!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
drink up & kiss me!
Joined: Jan 2009
Location: SoFla (Ft Lauderdale)
Posts: 15,157
|
CONGRATULATIONS!!! you deserve a HUGE reward for all of that hard work...way to go!
again, cut it the most important. I would never go higher than I & SI1 for my ears...you just won't be able to tell much of a difference in color/clarity on your ears. so based on the cut & the position of the inclusion, I'd go for A. or swap out the included stone, & still go for A. |
|
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: CT
Posts: 941
|
Congrats! I totally agree with everyone, CUT is the most important factor and what will make them look super sparkly on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
yes please
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,738
|
OK... I will call her back tomorrow and see if I can get the certificates faxed to me or to get some more info on the cuts. She was saying something about the cuts, but my cell phone (or hers) was totally cutting out. Grrrrr!!!
Thanks for all the well wishes! It's still sinking in that I am truly board certified! :) |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 47
|
Congratulations on passing the boards! Always a wonderful idea to celebrate something with jewelry that you'll have forever. :)
I was just diamond shopping with my brother and the dealer had two stones - one a super-ideal cut and one just a 'normal' cut. We put the two stones under this instrument that measures brilliance. Even though the 'normal' cut stone had better color and clarity than the "super ideal" cut, the "super ideal" cut was far and away more brilliant (and cost less too). Good luck with your search! |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
yes please
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,738
|
An update!
So I called her back and asked about cut. She said since the stones are all round they have the same number of facets, and that cut actually matters *less*, especially on the ears. (E-rings are a whole other ball game.) The stones she has aren't officially certified... so there are no certificates for me to see, she said to have that done is 10-15% more, and again, not really worth it for the ears. I stopped at (don't laugh) Zales after work just to sniff around and get some comparisons. They had a 2 ctw set that were nice but had noticeable inclusions, $5500. So, with that information, what do you guys think? I've been to this woman's home and trust that she's not going to sell me crap. I just wish I knew more about this process so that I didn't feel so vulnerable. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Shoe Lust
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 722
|
congrats on passing, i can offer no diamond expertise but please post pics when you get em!
|
|
|
|