|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 1,087
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
YSL MOD
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 5,469
|
Congrats on your lovely bracelet.
I've been collecting David Yurman for about five years now, and I'm not familiar with this style, so perhaps it is older than that. Are you certain it is David Yurman? Is it stamped (c) David Yurman, or D. Yurman, or DY? I'm just asking because there are a lot of other designers who are doing similar types of sterling/18k jewelry these days. I'm pretty sure that the stone is a pink tourmaline. Below are a couple of current "wheat chain" bracelets by Yurman (from nm.com). They are in the $500-range. But your bracelet has more gold--plus the tourmaline--so that would make it more valuable, I presume. $425 ![]() $490
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
YSL MOD
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 5,469
|
I'm guessing that a David Yurman bracelet with that amount of gold and the gemstone accents probably retailed in the neighborhood of $700-800 a few years ago. It's always hard to know what price you could get if you try to resell it, though. Good luck.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
keykey36
Joined: Feb 2006
Location: So Cal
Posts: 2,800
|
I just bought a necklace for my brother that looks similar to yours.
Is it Titainium (Sp?) The really light weight metal! ?? |
|
__________________
![]() Key has a handbag hang*over !
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1
|
I'm embarassed to ask this question but, I have a Yurman bracelet cable style with Topaz ends. I have seen them worn both ways, stones on top of wrist and stones on bottom, like a regular cuff bracelet. Which is the proper way???
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 968
|
^^My mom told me the stones on top. sometimes I see ppl w/ the real thick bracelets w/ stones on bottom, prob cause the bracelet is heavy so it may shift.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,210
|
I have a 10mm DY bracelet and I only wear it with the stones up...the bracelet does not shift, it's a cuff style.....here's a pic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Cherokee H Princess
Joined: Dec 2006
Location: in my jewelry box
Posts: 3,174
|
Definitely stones up. Why bother having stones if they aren't going to be shown? Kind of like wearing your engagement ring with the diamond turned around. And I think you would risk cracking or breaking the gems if they were on the underside of your wrist. Would be very hard on them.
Lisa |
|
__________________
Something special this way comes...
|
|
|
|
|