THE BEST BLACK FRIDAY SALES

Yoox

20% Off With Code: YOOXGIVING

Moda Operandi

Black Friday Sale

Neiman Marcus

Up To 40% Off Designer Sale

Saks Fifth Ave

Up To 60% Off Selected Styles

Nordstrom

Up To 40% Off

Net-A-Porter

Up To 50% Off Designer Sale

Bloomingdale's

Up to 50% Off Big Brown Bag Sale

ASOS

Black Friday 30% Off With Code: TGIBF
Home > >

***Comparison of MB's BB 105 and CL's Pigalle 100***

POST A REPLY
 
Thread Tools
May 2, 2012, 9:06pm   #1
CEC.LV4eva's Avatar
Thread Starter
CEC.LV4eva
Bal_RO_Céline
Recently Manolo Blahnik's BB 105 has been very popular and there were several people wanting to compare this style to Christian Louboutin's Pigalle 100. I personally think they're two completely different styles.

I've created this thread with pix for comparison, so you ladies can judge for yourself

Please note that the Pigalle here is like 1/4 size too small, but the BBs are 1/4 size too big on me lol... So overall I would say that the BB here is relatively half size bigger than the Pigalle if that makes sense...

1. Heel height - BB is 5mm higher at 105mm

2. Type of heel - BB is MUCH thinner, maybe 1/3 of Pigalle's and is slightly curved.

Name:  Comparison1.MB_BB.CL_Pigalle.jpg
Views: 7396
Size:  266.7 KB

Shoes below lined against flat surface perpendicular to table, so that they're aligned from the heel, showing accurate length comparison.

3. Toebox - BB is slightly longer and wider.

Like I said, the relative size difference is about half a size. So the BB's length is probably only about 4-5 mm longer than the Pigalle, rather than what the pic shows at about 10 mm

Name:  Comparison2.MB_BB.CL_Pigalle.jpg
Views: 6188
Size:  271.1 KB

Name:  Comparison3.MB_BB.CL_Pigalle.jpg
Views: 6622
Size:  251.8 KB

Lastly,

4. Level of comfort is probably what ultimately differentiates the two styles.

BB is like 100000000 times more comfortable cuz they're about 5mm longer and 5 mm wider than the Pigalle. Plus, Manolo's patent leather (suede and fabric too!) is MUCHHHHHH softer than CL's patent leather which is rock hard, which I guess makes it more difficult to break in...
I have 4 pairs and wear them to work, dinner, shopping, just about anything! I can't imagine wearing the Pigalle anywhere other than sitting on my couch LOL!
May 3, 2012, 1:52am   #2
j
jz2386
Member
Thank you for this great review! I'm rather surprised by how much thicker the Louboutin heel is. You'd think that with a heel that thick it would be much more comfortable than the Manolos! Also I see that you put a pair of foot petals in your Manolos. Do they have less padding than the Louboutins?
Last edited May 3, 2012 at 1:57am.
May 3, 2012, 1:55am   #3
j
jz2386
Member
Also, I'm not sure if you own the following shoes, but if you do, could you do a quick comparison between the shoes above and Jimmy Choo Agnes and the heel of the YSL Tribtoos?
May 3, 2012, 6:48am   #4
CEC.LV4eva's Avatar
Thread Starter
CEC.LV4eva
Bal_RO_Céline
Originally Posted by jz2386
Thank you for this great review! I'm rather surprised by how much thicker the Louboutin heel is. You'd think that with a heel that thick it would be much more comfortable than the Manolos! Also I see that you put a pair of foot petals in your Manolos. Do they have less padding than the Louboutins?
You're welcome :)

No, Manolo's padding is always more than Louboutin's imo. The Footpetal is there only because they're slightly big on me.

Originally Posted by jz2386
Also, I'm not sure if you own the following shoes, but if you do, could you do a quick comparison between the shoes above and Jimmy Choo Agnes and the heel of the YSL Tribtoos?
Sorry, I don't own these shoes. However, I have a pair of JC Colorado that is very similar to the Agnes

Are you thinking of a pair for work? If so, both MB's BB and any of JC's shoes are all very suitable. JC is always very comfortable for me, but their toebox is narrower than MB's
May 3, 2012, 9:49am   #5
billbill's Avatar
billbill
Member
thanks for the thread, didn't realize that the BB's heels is that thin..

my feet hurt on wearing the pigalle 100 to a wedding dinner for 3 hours, which i sit for almost 2.5 hours already... =(
May 3, 2012, 9:01pm   #6
CEC.LV4eva's Avatar
Thread Starter
CEC.LV4eva
Bal_RO_Céline
Originally Posted by billbill
thanks for the thread, didn't realize that the BB's heels is that thin..

my feet hurt on wearing the pigalle 100 to a wedding dinner for 3 hours, which i sit for almost 2.5 hours already... =(
lol my feet hurt as soon as I put my Pigalles on!!!

I also prefer BB's heel - it's very thin but more balanced with the sleek silhouette of the shoe to me???
Also, unlike CL's thin heels (eg. Fifi) which WOBBLE (and I'm only 105 lbs), BB's heels are extremely stable
May 6, 2012, 12:59am   #7
billbill's Avatar
billbill
Member
Originally Posted by CEC.LV4eva
lol my feet hurt as soon as I put my Pigalles on!!!

I also prefer BB's heel - it's very thin but more balanced with the sleek silhouette of the shoe to me???
Also, unlike CL's thin heels (eg. Fifi) which WOBBLE (and I'm only 105 lbs), BB's heels are extremely stable
i like thin heels, the thinner the happier...

yes, i bought Fifi too.. it's like the heels cannot stand on my weight. at first i think it's my problem but heard from others that it's the design.. i'm kind of relieved or else i got to lose weight on wearing thin heels..
May 8, 2012, 1:54am   #8
grtlegs's Avatar
grtlegs
Member
I wanted to chime in on this discussion as well since I also have a Pigalle 100(black kid) and a pair of Manolo BB (black patent).....I too find the BB much more comfortable than the Pigalle.....I also have the CL New Decoltissimo's and yet again find the Manolo BB's more comfortable.....and yes, I too have a pair of Jimmy Choo Colorado and find them to be very comfortable...Overall, I have found Manolo's my most comfortable heels....was a huge fan of the Blixa pumps, and now absolutely love the BB's and hope to pick up other colors......I have tried on the JC Agnes(or was it the Abel?), the one with the 100mm heel and found them to be quite comfortable in the store but I don't own them so don't know if they would still be comfortable after many hours.....

I think Manolo hit it out of the ball park with the BB.....anyone out there have any experience with the new one called CC?...looks similar to BB but a slightly different cut...
May 8, 2012, 11:54am   #9
CEC.LV4eva's Avatar
Thread Starter
CEC.LV4eva
Bal_RO_Céline
Originally Posted by grtlegs
I wanted to chime in on this discussion as well since I also have a Pigalle 100(black kid) and a pair of Manolo BB (black patent).....I too find the BB much more comfortable than the Pigalle.....I also have the CL New Decoltissimo's and yet again find the Manolo BB's more comfortable.....and yes, I too have a pair of Jimmy Choo Colorado and find them to be very comfortable...Overall, I have found Manolo's my most comfortable heels....was a huge fan of the Blixa pumps, and now absolutely love the BB's and hope to pick up other colors......I have tried on the JC Agnes(or was it the Abel?), the one with the 100mm heel and found them to be quite comfortable in the store but I don't own them so don't know if they would still be comfortable after many hours.....

I think Manolo hit it out of the ball park with the BB.....anyone out there have any experience with the new one called CC?...looks similar to BB but a slightly different cut...
hehe great minds think alike grtlegs!!!

Yeah, I've tried on the CCs too. Someone else was also asking about them a while back, and to me, the difference lies in the toebox area. CCs have the SAME toebox as MB's classic MJ heels (Campari) which has sort of a more "stumpy" tip... Not as refined looking as the BB imo... because of the tip, I think it's also *slightly* wider and longer too, so if you have wider feet, the CC is probably even better suited than the BB, although I'm sure BB will accommodate most people's feet very well
May 13, 2012, 1:34am   #10
t
tangerine21
Member
I am actually quite surprised that the heel of the Pigalle is so much more chunky than the one of the BB. Louboutin is known for his sexy flair, and I am amazed that he did not use a fifi-esque heel on his signature Pump!
May 13, 2012, 5:46pm   #11
CEC.LV4eva's Avatar
Thread Starter
CEC.LV4eva
Bal_RO_Céline
Originally Posted by tangerine21
I am actually quite surprised that the heel of the Pigalle is so much more chunky than the one of the BB. Louboutin is known for his sexy flair, and I am amazed that he did not use a fifi-esque heel on his signature Pump!
The *original* Pigalle that came out indeed had a very very thin and CURVED heel that was also at a much lower height around 85mm. I think it was only in the early 2000s that the heel changed to a straight, thicker, and higher one. A straight heel gives the illusion of a higher height than a curved heel and that's all monsieur louboutin is driven by these days lol
May 14, 2012, 1:18pm   #12
CEC.LV4eva's Avatar
Thread Starter
CEC.LV4eva
Bal_RO_Céline
^Sorry, I should correct myself getting confused. I was thinking of another shoe, the Sixties, that came out around 2004 with a curved heel, then a year or two later the Pigalle was launched with a straight heel. However, the curved and thinner heeled Pigalle did come out around 2008 in a lower heel height and a 120 height. Here's the higher version as worn by Sienna Miller:

Name:  siennamiller.jpg
Views: 6402
Size:  54.9 KB

Name:  Pigalle 120 Blue .jpg
Views: 5823
Size:  42.6 KB
Jun 19, 2012, 6:14pm   #13
legendofzelda's Avatar
legendofzelda
Member
Thanks so much for this guide! I was waffling between the Pigalle and the BB, and this made it so clear that the BB is the way to go.
Jun 26, 2012, 3:12am   #14
grtlegs's Avatar
grtlegs
Member
I love my new copper patent BB's from the Nordstroms women and children sale earlier this month..
Attached Images
 
Jun 26, 2012, 7:36am   #15
CEC.LV4eva's Avatar
Thread Starter
CEC.LV4eva
Bal_RO_Céline
Originally Posted by grtlegs
I love my new copper patent BB's from the Nordstroms women and children sale earlier this month..
congrats! they're lovely!
POST A REPLY
  HOME > >  
TOP

Thread Tools