Quote:
Originally Posted by KathyinCanada
I just re-read all the posts and I don't think that anyone's purpose was to bash Tano. I think people gave their honest opinions (as did I). I frequently come to TPF for reviews on bags that I am considering buying and I want to hear everybody's opinion not just the people who have positive reviews. My concern is that once a brand gets a sub-forum it becomes difficult to get a variety of viewpoints on a bag esp. if everyone is encouraged to only post positive opinions. If I'm considering buying a bag, I want to know if someone found the straps too short/had a hard time getting in and out of the bag/had quality issues/found that the leather degraded over time etc. It's not something people should take personally....everyone has different tastes, that's why there is such a wonderful variety of bags to choose from 
|
I completely agree! Reading forums can be fun (and expensive) but my primary purpose is research. I do much of my shopping on the Net - even in a big city there is no one store that carries everything you can find online. So I need honesty, not just a fan club. Which is what brings me to post...
I've now ordered and returned four different Tano bags, two crunch and two lenny. They're simply not for me for a variety of reasons. Too big without organization, too shiny, thin trim leather that looks worn out, lenny is more distressed looking than I expected, etc. etc. However, I still think that they look fabulous in photos, and I might be led to try again 'cause I keep thinking about the French Nanny!
P.S. Lest anyone think I'm a bag snob, I rarely spend more than $200 on a bag and I hate to pay full retail for anything!