Welcome to The Purse Forum.

annemerrick · Oct 13th, 2009, 10:26 AM

Shoot...bidding has ended!! I thought I would get it with my "pocket money" for the week!!!

(writing "pocket money" made me feel like a 10 year old English child!)

natalie78 · Oct 13th, 2009, 10:26 AM

I cannot say a definite yes or no. I know that I will never have that kind of money, so try not to think about it.

ilvoelv · Oct 13th, 2009, 10:41 AM

Originally Posted by lvuittonaddict

if i could drop 100k and not miss it, heck yes i would. i would have 10 of them. there are some women on tpf who have them

Haha. Me too!!

Vintage Leather · Oct 13th, 2009, 11:19 AM

I hate to say it, but I just don't enjoy the feel of croc - and I hate how delicate it is. Not to mention the hassel of travelling with CITES certificates, and... It's gorgeous with other people, but it isn't me.

I'd have a hard time spending a couple of hundred on a croc - I wouldn't carry it enough to justify over that.

As for a non-croc bag - possibly. But I'd more likely spend it on something else first...

chantal1922 · Oct 13th, 2009, 11:22 AM

I don't think I would feel comfortable with a $100,000 bag.

IrisCole · Oct 13th, 2009, 11:24 AM

I wouldn't, but only because I think you can get an insanely cool crocodile bag for a lot less. Even if I had gobs of money, $100k seems way too high for a bag. But that said, if I wouldn't miss it, I'd probably fork out $20,000-$30,000 for a bag. {And I wouldn't turn my nose up at the pricier bag if someone decided they wanted to give it me, lol!!}

aliysiah · Oct 13th, 2009, 12:40 PM

LOL I knew it. Hermes... they're the only ones with that kind of ridiculous price tag.

But I WOULD NEVER spend that much on a single handbag, when I could take that money and use it for something more worthwhile, and buy a lifetime supply of bags instead. H bags are okay looking, but they're not for me. $99K is a huge chunkload of dough.

My price limit for any bag would be $1.6K at most. Maybe less.

Bay · Oct 13th, 2009, 12:44 PM

Nope. Not even if I was filthy rich.

lorihmatthews · Oct 13th, 2009, 12:46 PM

I really doubt it. I'd put other things first, like houses, cars and savings. A bag like this one would be way down on the totem pole.

Lv-nowwhat · Oct 13th, 2009, 12:49 PM

I do not think I would but you never know. Many TPFers do and I so would love to be one of them.. Some wealthy woman would never spend 1000 on a purse so its all relative.

PANda_USC · Oct 13th, 2009, 01:43 PM

absolutely. If I could afford it(not go into debt and still be able to be a foodie/restaurant hopper and raise a family, have a house etc, pay the bills easily(health, school etc)), I would! I have had my eye on a Croc Hermes for a few months now....but haha, those will have to wait until..hmm..I don't know..a long time...

GTOFan · Oct 13th, 2009, 01:44 PM

If money was truly "no object"

ChiChi143 · Oct 13th, 2009, 01:50 PM

I doubt it

artlover · Oct 13th, 2009, 05:44 PM

I guess I have to think it over around 99,000 times if I should buy it or not. That's a lot of money to pay for a handbag....and even if I have the money, I still need justification why I should pay $99,000 for a bag.

Kitsunegrl · Oct 13th, 2009, 05:46 PM

too rich for my blood!

Oct 13th, 2009, 10:26 AM	#16
annemerrick Member Joined: Mar 2006 Location: Desperately Seeking Deals Posts: 5,283	Shoot...bidding has ended!! I thought I would get it with my "pocket money" for the week!!! (writing "pocket money" made me feel like a 10 year old English child!)
	__________________ Visit my blog (if you so desire) at: http://desperatelyseekingdeals.blogs...&max-results=2

Oct 13th, 2009, 10:26 AM	#17
natalie78 Dave's not here Joined: May 2008 Location: Texas Posts: 1,658	I cannot say a definite yes or no. I know that I will never have that kind of money, so try not to think about it.
	__________________ I consider myself a good judge of people and that's why I don't like any of them. ~Roseanne

Oct 13th, 2009, 11:19 AM	#19
Vintage Leather Dreamer and Shopper Joined: Jan 2007 Location: US Posts: 737	I hate to say it, but I just don't enjoy the feel of croc - and I hate how delicate it is. Not to mention the hassel of travelling with CITES certificates, and... It's gorgeous with other people, but it isn't me. I'd have a hard time spending a couple of hundred on a croc - I wouldn't carry it enough to justify over that. As for a non-croc bag - possibly. But I'd more likely spend it on something else first...
	__________________ My Grail Scarf: Les Trois Mousquetaires Everything with Turtles!! Grail Bag 32 cm 1963 black box kelly... HERMES TAMBOUR! Any colour, any leather - I'm not proud

Oct 13th, 2009, 11:22 AM	#20
chantal1922 Dreaming of Damier Joined: Jun 2009 Location: Arlington Va Posts: 568	I don't think I would feel comfortable with a $100,000 bag.
	__________________ My Coach Collection My blog http://poodlefashion22.blogspot.com/ Robin Thicke + Coach = Heaven Wish List LV Damier Speedy 25

Oct 13th, 2009, 11:24 AM	#21
IrisCole Member Joined: Dec 2007 Posts: 2,528	I wouldn't, but only because I think you can get an insanely cool crocodile bag for a lot less. Even if I had gobs of money, $100k seems way too high for a bag. But that said, if I wouldn't miss it, I'd probably fork out $20,000-$30,000 for a bag. {And I wouldn't turn my nose up at the pricier bag if someone decided they wanted to give it me, lol!!}
IrisCole Member Joined: Dec 2007 Posts: 2,528	__________________ Fashion & Design: http://www.PrettyLittleWorldFashion.blogspot.com --------------- Follow Me on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/PrettyLilWorld --------------- Pretty Little World Vintage: http://www.nikitajade.etsy.com

Oct 13th, 2009, 12:40 PM	#22
aliysiah Sofa King Banned Joined: Oct 2009 Posts: 810	LOL I knew it. Hermes... they're the only ones with that kind of ridiculous price tag. But I WOULD NEVER spend that much on a single handbag, when I could take that money and use it for something more worthwhile, and buy a lifetime supply of bags instead. H bags are okay looking, but they're not for me. $99K is a huge chunkload of dough. My price limit for any bag would be $1.6K at most. Maybe less.
aliysiah Sofa King Banned Joined: Oct 2009 Posts: 810

Oct 13th, 2009, 12:44 PM	#23
Bay Purses are teh shiet Joined: Feb 2007 Location: With my love =) Posts: 5,129	Nope. Not even if I was filthy rich.
	__________________ *Trying to keep my eyes on the prize* ~Pretty content with what I have, some days~ On a Bag Ban!?! Love Pyramid Studs

Oct 13th, 2009, 12:46 PM	#24
lorihmatthews Fall is here! Joined: Oct 2006 Location: San Francisco Posts: 11,036	I really doubt it. I'd put other things first, like houses, cars and savings. A bag like this one would be way down on the totem pole.
	__________________ My blog: Part-time Fashion for a Full-time Life Twitter: lorihmatthews

Oct 13th, 2009, 12:49 PM	#25
Lv-nowwhat a LV fan Joined: Jul 2008 Location: Detroit, Michigan Posts: 3,775	I do not think I would but you never know. Many TPFers do and I so would love to be one of them.. Some wealthy woman would never spend 1000 on a purse so its all relative.
	__________________ *Next on list 2010* LV electric black epi Alma LV Bass MM Hermes Evelyne TGM Donate to an inner city classroom So many bags, so little time!!

Oct 13th, 2009, 01:43 PM	#26
PANda_USC ♥ Strass CL Hunter ♥ Joined: Aug 2009 Location: Pacific Heights in San Francisco Posts: 2,341	absolutely. If I could afford it(not go into debt and still be able to be a foodie/restaurant hopper and raise a family, have a house etc, pay the bills easily(health, school etc)), I would! I have had my eye on a Croc Hermes for a few months now....but haha, those will have to wait until..hmm..I don't know..a long time...
	__________________ Shopping List 2009-2010 CHANEL: Jumbos Red C GHW, Navy C SHW\| M/L Beige C GHW\| 227 Matte Black Reissue GHW CL's: RR's Fuxia Glitter, LS Black w/Gold Strass, R Black Patent, B Nude Patent UHG's: Chanel M/L Fuchsia SHW or GHW, CL LC Aurora Borealis Strass and Fire Opal Strass, CL LC Stars Black My Yorkie S'mores**

Oct 13th, 2009, 01:44 PM	#27
GTOFan Member Joined: Apr 2006 Posts: 5,061	If money was truly "no object"
GTOFan Member Joined: Apr 2006 Posts: 5,061

Oct 13th, 2009, 01:50 PM	#28
ChiChi143 ♥ Happily Engaged ♥ Joined: Jun 2007 Location: New York Posts: 8,256	I doubt it
	__________________

Oct 13th, 2009, 05:44 PM	#29
artlover Member Joined: May 2008 Location: Canada Posts: 58	I guess I have to think it over around 99,000 times if I should buy it or not. That's a lot of money to pay for a handbag....and even if I have the money, I still need justification why I should pay $99,000 for a bag.

Oct 13th, 2009, 05:46 PM	#30
Kitsunegrl Cartier in 2009! Joined: Nov 2006 Location: Cajun Country Posts: 7,751	too rich for my blood!
	__________________ Lorretta

Welcome to The Purse Forum.

Our Purse Forum, or TPF, is the #1 online social network for everything designer handbag related. Join over 200,000 enthusiastic members in this friendly community and start engaging in the discussion today.