|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1396 |
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 442
|
It was called the Sienna print. I believe that it was called the Sienna large satchel. I have this in the bouvier style and LOVE it. I get compliments every time I carry it. |
|
|
|
|
#1397 |
|
12 x in LVoe
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: VIKING LAND!
Posts: 942
|
Papertiger and others
![]() Thank you....here are more close ups....this is as close as I can come with my camera, hope it'll do. TIA |
|
|
|
|
#1398 |
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Location: uk
Posts: 45
|
Both your bigger pieces are shoulder bags (you prob know that) |
|
|
|
|
#1399 | ||||
|
Member
Joined: May 2009
Location: UK/France
Posts: 2,687
|
But I meant that I need the silver hallmarks that are stamped to show its silver and Gucci. I think I saw something on the inside of the cuff along with the GUCCI R bit. You will have to magnify them after you take a pic. |
||||
|
|
|
|
#1400 |
|
Member
Joined: May 2009
Location: UK/France
Posts: 2,687
|
countrygirltu
all your vintage looks ok from your pics. Agree about Majictrix the names thing. Doesn't seem to matter with vintage anyway. |
|
|
|
|
#1401 |
|
12 x in LVoe
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: VIKING LAND!
Posts: 942
|
![]() I'll be back in a minute...... |
|
|
|
|
#1402 |
|
Member
Joined: May 2009
Location: UK/France
Posts: 2,687
|
But I usually see vintage bags go for £60-100 on ebay UK - no idea on US or others It's nice that you have the original boxes and dust covers |
|
|
|
|
#1403 |
|
Member
Joined: May 2009
Location: UK/France
Posts: 2,687
|
Thank you, are you sure it was the satchel? Lovely, lovely print must look great on the Bouvier and bound to actually hold its value. |
|
|
|
|
#1404 |
|
12 x in LVoe
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: VIKING LAND!
Posts: 942
|
Papertiger - this might be better
![]() You're so sweet for helping - thanks a lot
|
|
|
|
|
#1405 |
|
Member
Joined: May 2009
Location: UK/France
Posts: 2,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1406 |
|
Member
Joined: May 2009
Location: UK/France
Posts: 2,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1407 | ||||
|
12 x in LVoe
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: VIKING LAND!
Posts: 942
|
![]() Please explain again, what I need to magnify....sorry for my incompetence. |
||||
|
Last edited by mardon; Jul 5th, 2009 at 09:24 AM. |
|||||
|
|
|
|
#1408 | ||||
|
Member
Joined: May 2009
Location: UK/France
Posts: 2,687
|
on the right (our right looking at it now) there are tiny marks which should be silver stamps to prove that A it's 9.25 silver B the date and C the maker (in this case Gucci) On fakes - it might still be silver so it might say 9.25 and the other marks will be 'fudged' or it might just have 'fudged' marks to look they they are stamped silver/date/brand marks to fool the eye. Gucci marks should be clear. I'm gonna have to go out now but I will look again later - hope your not in hurry ps thanks for bringing this up I'm gonna copy some of this post in the 'authenticity tips thread' |
||||
|
|
|
|
#1409 | ||||
|
Member
Joined: May 2009
Location: UK/France
Posts: 2,687
|
I'm gonna go and get my gucci silver stuff later and compare ok? So hang on looks promising actually but don't let us rush. Must go out I'm going a bit 'cabin fever' crazy!
|
||||
|
|
|
|
#1410 |
|
12 x in LVoe
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: VIKING LAND!
Posts: 942
|
Okay.....so the pics that I attached with the close-ups of the tiny marks (with my latest post) are good? They show the two stamps....one with 925 and another with some other numbers. I'm not in a hurry - just so happy that you have time to help me out
|
|
|