Welcome to The Purse Forum.

xnplo · Apr 24th, 2008, 05:28 PM

320244312403

JetSetGo! · Apr 24th, 2008, 08:11 PM

Stinas I think this listing is good.
320244287336
She says she still has the Saks receipt. They are gently worn which may justify the low price?

Stinas · Apr 24th, 2008, 08:16 PM

Originally Posted by JetSetGo!

Stinas I think this listing is good.
320244287336
She says she still has the Saks receipt. They are gently worn which may justify the low price?

I dont know. From the front they look black, then the heel looks a lot like my brown suede with copper heel & toe tip.
We also reported this listing not too long ago with same pics plus one more that was a VP not NP.
Too fishy to me IMO.
If I were listing them I would not have them start at $150 w/out reserve.

JetSetGo! · Apr 24th, 2008, 08:37 PM

You are totally right! They are two different shoes, plus the pix are taken in two different places. I'll report them now. Great catch!

archygirl · Apr 24th, 2008, 10:21 PM

Originally Posted by JetSetGo!

Stinas I think this listing is good.
320244287336
She says she still has the Saks receipt. They are gently worn which may justify the low price?

Stinas is right, the photos are of two different shoes

. I just reported them too.

xnplo · Apr 25th, 2008, 01:28 AM

250241049850

Steve Madden shoe w/ Louboutin keyword spam...

JetSetGo! · Apr 25th, 2008, 06:26 AM

FAKE VPS by pavlushkin (107)

330231115573
230246532568
230246530774

Fake Miss Fred by freetopshop (210)
280221236279

Fake Tiger NP
160233961357
She looks like an okay seller in other areas, but these look very wrong to me. Anyone else think so?

MKWMDA · Apr 25th, 2008, 09:23 AM

I have never seen a patterned CL faked, if those tiger NPs are fakes then we have a whole new world of trouble. Good lord I hope they arent.

Stinas · Apr 25th, 2008, 12:32 PM

Here are my reported items of the day.
330231115573, 230246532568, 230246530774, 280221236279, 160233961357, 320244287336, 250241049850

Jet - I think your right about the Tiger NP. IMO these shoes are very expensive, if you want to sell a pair that you claim are AUTHENTIC, there should be no problem or excuse when it comes to pics. This day & age, EVERYONE has digital cameras, so there is no excuse.
I would never go for an auction if there is not any original pics of the item you are bidding on. Just to play things safe.

ashakes · Apr 25th, 2008, 01:00 PM

In re: to the tiger NPs, I think using the Saks stock pic only is a no no. I use stock photos here and there, but I ALWAYS have actual photos of the items too. IMO, if you don't take the time to post actual photos there is something off.

They don't make fakes of the tiger NPs, but who knows what will end up on your doorstep!

danicky · Apr 25th, 2008, 02:50 PM

Originally Posted by ashakes

In re: to the tiger NPs, I think using the Saks stock pic only is a no no. I use stock photos here and there, but I ALWAYS have actual photos of the items too. IMO, if you don't take the time to post actual photos there is something off.

They don't make fakes of the tiger NPs, but who knows what will end up on your doorstep!

I emailed the seller, and she said the shoes were bought last year at NM, and they do not come with box or dust bag. She guarantees authenticity, and has a no questions asked return policy.
Do you think that's odd????

ashakes · Apr 25th, 2008, 02:55 PM

Well NM had them too. They just had the black colored heel *I think*. I had them from the NM consolidation sale (w/ box and all) and I sold them b/c I knew I would never wear them.

The ones from Saks had the tiger covered heel (again going from memory) like the ones shown in the Saks.com stock photo. So, her pair from NM is going to be different as is. Technically, a buyer could do a "item not described" claim if he/she really wanted to.

I have seen sellers put stock photos up just to get the auction running, BUT they add photos later that day. If you aren't showing photos of the actual item up for auction, I will be taking my money elsewhere. LOL I'm not gonna lie taking photos of shoes, especially used, is a PITA, but I mean it's not that hard.

danicky · Apr 25th, 2008, 03:06 PM

Originally Posted by ashakes

Well NM had them too. They just had the black colored heel *I think*. I had them from the NM consolidation sale (w/ box and all) and I sold them b/c I knew I would never wear them.

The ones from Saks had the tiger covered heel (again going from memory) like the ones shown in the Saks.com stock photo. So, her pair from NM is going to be different as is. Technically, a buyer could do a "item not described" claim if he/she really wanted to.

I have seen sellers put stock photos up just to get the auction running, BUT they add photos later that day. If you aren't showing photos of the actual item up for auction, I will be taking my money elsewhere. LOL I'm not gonna lie taking photos of shoes, especially used, is a PITA, but I mean it's not that hard.

Lol, I know. She actually sent me a picture of the shoes. What do you think?
image002.jpg

wantmore · Apr 25th, 2008, 03:28 PM

danicky - that picture is too small, but the patent leather looks good with it's iridescent gold. Can you ask for more, bigger pictures?

Stinas · Apr 25th, 2008, 04:06 PM

If she can send you a pic that fast why couldnt she just put them on the listing? Its not like its hard or even expensive. Thats what really gets me.
Its a listing I would not touch lol

Apr 24th, 2008, 05:28 PM	#76
xnplo Member Joined: Mar 2007 Posts: 1,639	Re: Fake Christian Louboutins 320244312403
xnplo Member Joined: Mar 2007 Posts: 1,639

Apr 24th, 2008, 08:11 PM	#77
JetSetGo! CL Soldier of '08 Joined: Feb 2008 Location: Living in my Louboutins Posts: 10,456	Re: Fake Christian Louboutins Stinas I think this listing is good. 320244287336 She says she still has the Saks receipt. They are gently worn which may justify the low price?
	__________________ My Bags & My CLs Report Fake CLs & How to Report please let me know if you see... Sing Sing (40.5, 41, 41.5) Shocking Pink Satin Rolando (41) Blue Glittart Ron Ron (41)

Apr 24th, 2008, 08:37 PM	#79
JetSetGo! CL Soldier of '08 Joined: Feb 2008 Location: Living in my Louboutins Posts: 10,456	Re: Fake Christian Louboutins You are totally right! They are two different shoes, plus the pix are taken in two different places. I'll report them now. Great catch!
	__________________ My Bags & My CLs Report Fake CLs & How to Report please let me know if you see... Sing Sing (40.5, 41, 41.5) Shocking Pink Satin Rolando (41) Blue Glittart Ron Ron (41)

Apr 25th, 2008, 01:28 AM	#81
xnplo Member Joined: Mar 2007 Posts: 1,639	Re: Fake Christian Louboutins 250241049850 Steve Madden shoe w/ Louboutin keyword spam...
xnplo Member Joined: Mar 2007 Posts: 1,639

Apr 25th, 2008, 06:26 AM	#82
JetSetGo! CL Soldier of '08 Joined: Feb 2008 Location: Living in my Louboutins Posts: 10,456	Re: Fake Christian Louboutins FAKE VPS by pavlushkin (107) 330231115573 230246532568 230246530774 Fake Miss Fred by freetopshop (210) 280221236279 Fake Tiger NP 160233961357 She looks like an okay seller in other areas, but these look very wrong to me. Anyone else think so?
	__________________ My Bags & My CLs Report Fake CLs & How to Report please let me know if you see... Sing Sing (40.5, 41, 41.5) Shocking Pink Satin Rolando (41) Blue Glittart Ron Ron (41) Last edited by JetSetGo!; Apr 25th, 2008 at 06:45 AM.

Apr 25th, 2008, 09:23 AM	#83
MKWMDA Beautiful Disaster Joined: Jan 2008 Location: Kuwait Posts: 1,444	Re: Fake Christian Louboutins I have never seen a patterned CL faked, if those tiger NPs are fakes then we have a whole new world of trouble. Good lord I hope they arent.
	__________________ My current obsession: Hermes Scarves The colors orange, navy, and gray Wishlist: Hermes Black Togo Birkin 35cm Hermes JPG Shoulder Birkin 42cm Black

Apr 25th, 2008, 12:32 PM	#84
Stinas Member Joined: Mar 2007 Location: New Jersey Posts: 5,153	Re: Fake Christian Louboutins Here are my reported items of the day. 330231115573, 230246532568, 230246530774, 280221236279, 160233961357, 320244287336, 250241049850 Jet - I think your right about the Tiger NP. IMO these shoes are very expensive, if you want to sell a pair that you claim are AUTHENTIC, there should be no problem or excuse when it comes to pics. This day & age, EVERYONE has digital cameras, so there is no excuse. I would never go for an auction if there is not any original pics of the item you are bidding on. Just to play things safe.
	__________________ *Click Here To See My Shoes* My Christian Louboutin Collection CURRENTLY SEEKING: VP Pailletes - Green - Size 38.5 Fiorellino - Any Color - Size 38.5-39 Pin-Up - Any Color - Size 38.5-39

Apr 25th, 2008, 01:00 PM	#85
ashakes Member Joined: May 2007 Location: Ohio until further notice :) Posts: 4,756	Re: Fake Christian Louboutins In re: to the tiger NPs, I think using the Saks stock pic only is a no no. I use stock photos here and there, but I ALWAYS have actual photos of the items too. IMO, if you don't take the time to post actual photos there is something off. They don't make fakes of the tiger NPs, but who knows what will end up on your doorstep!

Apr 25th, 2008, 02:55 PM	#87
ashakes Member Joined: May 2007 Location: Ohio until further notice :) Posts: 4,756	Re: Fake Christian Louboutins Well NM had them too. They just had the black colored heel I think. I had them from the NM consolidation sale (w/ box and all) and I sold them b/c I knew I would never wear them. The ones from Saks had the tiger covered heel (again going from memory) like the ones shown in the Saks.com stock photo. So, her pair from NM is going to be different as is. Technically, a buyer could do a "item not described" claim if he/she really wanted to. I have seen sellers put stock photos up just to get the auction running, BUT they add photos later that day. If you aren't showing photos of the actual item up for auction, I will be taking my money elsewhere. LOL I'm not gonna lie taking photos of shoes, especially used, is a PITA, but I mean it's not that hard.

Apr 25th, 2008, 03:28 PM	#89
wantmore Member Joined: Sep 2007 Location: Hollyweird Posts: 3,803	Re: Fake Christian Louboutins danicky - that picture is too small, but the patent leather looks good with it's iridescent gold. Can you ask for more, bigger pictures?

Apr 25th, 2008, 04:06 PM	#90
Stinas Member Joined: Mar 2007 Location: New Jersey Posts: 5,153	Re: Fake Christian Louboutins If she can send you a pic that fast why couldnt she just put them on the listing? Its not like its hard or even expensive. Thats what really gets me. Its a listing I would not touch lol
	__________________ *Click Here To See My Shoes* My Christian Louboutin Collection CURRENTLY SEEKING: VP Pailletes - Green - Size 38.5 Fiorellino - Any Color - Size 38.5-39 Pin-Up - Any Color - Size 38.5-39

Welcome to The Purse Forum.

Our Purse Forum, or TPF, is the #1 online social network for everything designer handbag related. Join over 200,000 enthusiastic members in this friendly community and start engaging in the discussion today.