Hi everyone. I'm quite new to Chloe (and TPF too, although registered in 2009 I didn't start my own bag collection until this year). Now I can't decide between the two bags,
LV Bellflower PM Rouge VS Chloe Marcie Mini Crossbody Pink
Their size are pretty much the same. In my eyes their styles are similar.
They are both good...Vernis is shiny and red is classic...however Chloe calf leather is superior feel and I think pastel shade is a big big hit this year..just can't decide...
I am 24 and relatively petite size. Wear lots of neutral and usually in casual style. Please share your thoughts and help me decide!!
You are in the Chloe forum so this may be biased :)
That said, my most objective opinion is that the Chloe looks classic; both youthful and sophisticated depending on how you dress it up or down. The LV looks like a more "in the moment statement" bag. I feel that the shine coupled with the design will make it feel dated at some point. Really depends on the longevity you want out of the bag and what vibe you're going for. Ultimately it's whichever really calls to you and makes you happy.
I'll go for Chloe not coz tis is in the Chloe thread.. I tot tat the lv is alittle too loud n harder to match. Chloe is in a pastel colour n easy to go with most colours. Can look casual yet classy depending on ur dressing.. Maintenance wise I tink leather is easier than lv's (it's alittle porous from Wat I know).
I vote for Chloe too. Chloe is a "new LV" I read that LV margin for bags is around x13. When you buy Chloe it's more about craftsmanship and quality leather = value. and LV is a beginner's level bags (don't get me wrong I have 3 LVs, but I just stopped buying them when I learnt that what I'm paying goes mostly to corporate profits).