|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Which do you prefer? | |||
| Caviar |
|
162 | 57.65% |
| Lambskin |
|
119 | 42.35% |
| Voters: 281. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Location: Philippines
Posts: 383
|
Hi! I just bought my first Chanel bag, used but in excellent condition, a 2.55 (224) lambskin black bag and I'm just curious as to the difference between the lambskin and the caviar leather. Which is more expensive? Thanks! :)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 259
|
Lambskin is smoother and much more delicate = couple hundred dollars more expensive
Caviar is bumpier and much more durable = won't scratch as easily |
|
__________________
"swear on Chanel.." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,616
|
^ Yep, what she said
![]() Personally, I have lambskin in purses I will only use in special occassions and caviar in everyday purses :) |
|
__________________
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() Joined: Jan 2006
Location: Dallas Area
Posts: 42,765
|
they're right
![]() the caviar has a lightly textured feel, you know it's caviar right away. the lambskin is the softest Chanel leather and is least durable but SOOO soft. The Chanel SA I spoke w/ last week told me that the newer lambskin seems to have a 'finish' on it and doesn't seem quite as "vulnerable" as it was in past seasons. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Resistance is Futile
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 14,766
|
Personally, I love lambskin or deerskin vs. Caviar which I find a little stiff but I'm really partial to soft leathers. Lambskin does need a little extra attention.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,616
|
Calfskin is also a good material :)
I have a tan purse on that and its really nice! Not as soft as lambskin though! |
|
__________________
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() Joined: Jan 2006
Location: Dallas Area
Posts: 42,765
|
^ I agree, calfskin is also fab!
Can Chanel go wrong!? LOL! |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | ||||
|
Laughing AT you
Joined: Apr 2006
Location: The Land of the Biased
Posts: 5,013
|
Lambskin is more expensive. But caviar is more durable, and I know with my track record I tend to stick with bags in caviar.
|
||||
|
__________________
Before giving someone a piece of your mind, make sure there is enough to go around."The love inside...you take it with you." Patrick Swayze in Ghost |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Joined: May 2006
Location: Forbidden City
Posts: 404
|
How can you tell the difference between a calfskin and lambskin?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Have you eaten ?
Joined: Feb 2006
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 1,447
|
i like Caviar and Calfskin
|
|
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | ||||
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,044
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 333
|
Hi all,
Please do tell me what you prefer and why. Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
formerly Chloe
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,451
|
definitely caviar .. more classy + durable
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,869
|
lambskin...more classy- less durable though....
|
|
Last edited by imgg; Nov 26th, 2006 at 01:44 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,843
|
it really depends on how you are with bags. i tend to be rough and hate having the thought of needing to be extra careful so i lean more towards the caviar side. but the lambskin is unbelievable soft and does capture the true color in a amazingly way. scratches will show along with those imperfections that make the bag unique.
sorry if i have not been any help. |
|
|
|