|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#31 |
|
Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 584
|
Megan definitely has the 58, the medium. The 55 is way too small, the large ridiculously big. :) I have the 58.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 274
|
agree^. i just went to try these on at sunglasshut and they told me they dont even carry the larger ones above 58 because they are "ridiculously big." i want to order these from bestbuyeyeglasses.com cause they are a lot cheaper than sunglasshut or solstice but im nervous to order from there! love these glasses. also i read on 2 diff websites that megan has the W3280 ones and not the most popular -the L0205
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
~LV L♥ve~
Joined: Feb 2007
Location: Sunshine State
Posts: 5,653
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 274
|
^i think it is..? idk. i was just looking up reviews about it- some good, some bad. might just be better to buy in store so i know exactly what im getting. the price difference is like $25 though
|
|
Last edited by thatscute; Jul 15th, 2009 at 07:41 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 11,074
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 274
|
^not really sure? there are so many different colors for the 3025.
heres the L0205: http://www.sunglasses-shop.co.uk/uk-...L0205/2580.htm heres megans, the W3280: http://www.sunglasses-shop.co.uk/uk-...W3280/4655.htm actually here's some article about megan's cause i guess a bunch of people want to know the difference as well: "Since Megan Fox’s omnipresence in the media, many of you have been asking what differentiates Megan Fox’s (W3280) Ray Bans from every other gold model in the collection. To answer your question, her shades aren’t complete with polarised or photochromic technology meaning that they won’t filter out glare, nor will they react to light intensity. The lenses are cut from mineral glass and protect eyes from ultraviolet light. The coveted metal frame is gilded with a Yellow Gold colouring as apposed to traditional Gold, as for sizing medium (58mm) typically fits all but for those with smaller or larger faces should consider purchasing other size options in order accommodate their face type." -here's the link: http://eyewear-trends.com/tag/megan-fox-sunglasses/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 11,074
|
^^Wow - interesting. Thank you for posting. I wonder why you'd want to protect against ultraviolet light????
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
~LV L♥ve~
Joined: Feb 2007
Location: Sunshine State
Posts: 5,653
|
Hmm I'm interested in these but don't think they'd compliment my face.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 274
|
^i think they look good on pretty much everyone
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 11,074
|
I wonder if sunglasses hut has both of these. I'd like to try them on first before purchase.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 11,074
|
So what is the difference between:
RB3025 L0205 RB3025 W3280 They look exactly the same to me. How are they different? One is polarized and one is not? I found the L0205's at the store - and the SA said the same thing: that they weren't polarized??? I thought that was the W3280? Now I'm totally confused.... Help! |
|
Last edited by beauxgoris; Jul 28th, 2009 at 03:28 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 | ||||
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 274
|
^^
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 11,074
|
^^I was just at the store and was told by the SA that the L02025 wasn't polarized either??? I was told the L's were mineral glass too and only protected from glare. I thought that was supposed to be the difference between the two pairs though. They didn't have the other W's in stock for me to SEE any difference between the two...
|
|
|
|