Christian Louboutin Fug Bags

Megs · Jul 30th, 2007, 11:47 AM

If you had a reputation like that of Christian Louboutin shoes, why on Earth would you delve into a realm that you can not conquer just as well?? Instead of learning the ropes of the handbag world, Christian Louboutin has released some fug bags for fall that look as if they need to be tranquilized and locked up. First we have the hideous Christian Louboutin Orylag Hobo which appears to have saddle bags or really horribly off center breasts covered by orylag fur (rabbit fur) and dominatrix patent leather trim. This bag costs nearly $4000 at Saks, which means it is a frightfully expensive mess. Sure it would make a good pillow, but that is about it. Then we have the Christian Louboutin Alpaca Satchel. Hello bad perm job of 1983. Sure, once you actually touch the alpaca it will feel soft, but looking at this bag is like sitting in a lecture for 3 hours staring at a horrible head of hair in front of you. The kind of horrible where you hear nothing the instructor says and merely wonder if the person happened to get struck by lightning on the way to class. The calfskin trim and chain link handles do not help much. At least this bag is not as much as the first, costing $1695 at Saks.

So a note to those at Christian Louboutin: Stick with the shoes.

Pursegrrl · Jul 30th, 2007, 12:07 PM

Ouch! Serious fur fug. Love the bad perm from 1983 comparison....too funny!

Danica · Jul 30th, 2007, 12:17 PM

*ugh* totally worth the horendous death.

nasty bags.

riffraff · Jul 30th, 2007, 12:28 PM

Ewwwwww

May have been the in thing for the discerning cavewoman!

azia · Jul 30th, 2007, 12:31 PM

yikes! what is up with these fur bags coming out for fall? i've seen similar ones from other lines. YUCK.

theglamorous · Jul 30th, 2007, 12:42 PM

They are Ugly.

jane · Jul 30th, 2007, 01:23 PM

That alpaca bag is gonna look not good after being carried a few times. They should sell it with a hairbrush so you can pull the knots out. Awful.

karo · Jul 30th, 2007, 01:26 PM

Wooow, these bags are trully awful.

HandbagAngel · Jul 30th, 2007, 01:31 PM

OMG!!! They are expensively ugly.

noon · Jul 30th, 2007, 01:36 PM

yikes!

Liberté · Jul 30th, 2007, 05:38 PM

These are even worse than the fendi fug...

alatrop · Jul 30th, 2007, 06:25 PM

I hate fur enough as it is (for ethical reasons)...but if you're going to use fur, at least make it CUTE!

Thank goodness I have yet to eat dinner.

Juneplum · Jul 30th, 2007, 06:35 PM

Rose · Jul 30th, 2007, 06:53 PM

lol Megs, those really are unattractive! wow!

Oh Donna! · Jul 30th, 2007, 07:48 PM

probably the ugliest bags I have ever seen.

lets see, who will buy theirs first? Jessica, Paris or Christina? they all worship him.

Jul 30th, 2007, 12:07 PM	#2
Pursegrrl Oh no she di-int!! Location: Seattle	Re: Christian Louboutin Fug Bags Ouch! Serious fur fug. Love the bad perm from 1983 comparison....too funny!

Jul 30th, 2007, 12:17 PM	#3
Danica Mijn boter boontje Location: TN	Re: Christian Louboutin Fug Bags ugh totally worth the horendous death. nasty bags. __________________ Cheerleader for love

Jul 30th, 2007, 12:28 PM	#4
riffraff Sofa King Blonde! Location: UK	Re: Christian Louboutin Fug Bags Ewwwwww May have been the in thing for the discerning cavewoman! __________________ A girl should be two things: Classy and Fabulous. - Coco Chanel As long as you know men are like children, you know everything. - Coco Chanel Deep, deep inside the brain of every woman is a small bungalow in which lives a little lady who is totally obsessed with shoes and handbags

Jul 30th, 2007, 12:31 PM	#5
azia Member Location: Toronto	Re: Christian Louboutin Fug Bags yikes! what is up with these fur bags coming out for fall? i've seen similar ones from other lines. YUCK. __________________ 1. Chanel Black GST - got PST instead and love it! 2. Tiffany Bead Necklace and Bracelet - thx to the best bf! 3. LV Small Ring Agenda - thx to the lovely Javaboo! WISHLIST: Chanel Modern Chain Tote, Hermes Evelyne PM Have you read my blog yet?

Jul 30th, 2007, 12:42 PM	#6
theglamorous Member	Re: Christian Louboutin Fug Bags They are Ugly. __________________ I WANT MORE

Jul 30th, 2007, 11:47 AM	#1
Megs	Christian Louboutin Fug Bags If you had a reputation like that of Christian Louboutin shoes, why on Earth would you delve into a realm that you can not conquer just as well?? Instead of learning the ropes of the handbag world, Christian Louboutin has released some fug bags for fall that look as if they need to be tranquilized and locked up. First we have the hideous Christian Louboutin Orylag Hobo which appears to have saddle bags or really horribly off center breasts covered by orylag fur (rabbit fur) and dominatrix patent leather trim. This bag costs nearly $4000 at Saks, which means it is a frightfully expensive mess. Sure it would make a good pillow, but that is about it. Then we have the Christian Louboutin Alpaca Satchel. Hello bad perm job of 1983. Sure, once you actually touch the alpaca it will feel soft, but looking at this bag is like sitting in a lecture for 3 hours staring at a horrible head of hair in front of you. The kind of horrible where you hear nothing the instructor says and merely wonder if the person happened to get struck by lightning on the way to class. The calfskin trim and chain link handles do not help much. At least this bag is not as much as the first, costing $1695 at Saks. So a note to those at Christian Louboutin: Stick with the shoes. __________________ Sign up for our October Giveaway sponsored by: NET-A-PORTER!

Jul 30th, 2007, 01:23 PM	#7
jane It's an investment! Location: the Pacific Northwest	Re: Christian Louboutin Fug Bags That alpaca bag is gonna look not good after being carried a few times. They should sell it with a hairbrush so you can pull the knots out. Awful. __________________ :: read my blog ::

Jul 30th, 2007, 01:26 PM	#8
karo Member Location: Brussels, Europe	Re: Christian Louboutin Fug Bags Wooow, these bags are trully awful.

Jul 30th, 2007, 01:31 PM	#9
HandbagAngel Member	Re: Christian Louboutin Fug Bags OMG!!! They are expensively ugly.

Jul 30th, 2007, 01:36 PM	#10
noon Sun in my eyes Location: in the middle of the desert	Re: Christian Louboutin Fug Bags yikes!

Jul 30th, 2007, 05:38 PM	#11
Liberté Member	Re: Christian Louboutin Fug Bags These are even worse than the fendi fug... __________________

Jul 30th, 2007, 06:25 PM	#12
alatrop in LoVe :) Location: Ohio/Michigan	Re: Christian Louboutin Fug Bags I hate fur enough as it is (for ethical reasons)...but if you're going to use fur, at least make it CUTE! Thank goodness I have yet to eat dinner. __________________ in LoVe with my Azur Speedy 30 BANNED until I can save up for the next item

Jul 30th, 2007, 06:35 PM	#13
Juneplum Jamaica One Love Location: South Florida	Re: Christian Louboutin Fug Bags __________________ Female Addicted To Retail specktra.net - THE definitive MAC resource

Jul 30th, 2007, 06:53 PM	#14
Rose Pay it Forward Location: USA	Re: Christian Louboutin Fug Bags lol Megs, those really are unattractive! wow! __________________ The Scarfologist Celebrities and Scarves Scarf Knotting Instructions Les Ailes d'Hermes Gallery

Jul 30th, 2007, 07:48 PM	#15
Oh Donna! Member	Re: Christian Louboutin Fug Bags probably the ugliest bags I have ever seen. lets see, who will buy theirs first? Jessica, Paris or Christina? they all worship him.